Biological Diversity

Mike Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 24 April 2006, Official Report, columns 813-4W, on biological diversity, what contribution she expects the UK to make towards each of the recommendations; what her timetable is for thedelivery of such contributions; and if she will make a statement.

Barry Gardiner: The Government were closely involved in developing many of the initiatives agreed upon at the Eigth Conference of Parties (COP 8) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), including in it's EU presidency role in the latter half of 2006. We will continue to support the EU in forthcoming international negotiations, including on the conservation of marine biodiversity and genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction, and on the development of an international regime on Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources.
	Many of the decisions from the conference include a call for regional responses and we expect these to be discussed at the next meeting of the Working Party on International Environmental Issues (Biodiversity) in June.
	Once the definitive versions of the Decisions taken at COP 8 are available on the website of the Convention on Biological Diversity, my officials will review with other Departments, the devolved administrations and the Nature Conservation Agencies how to ensure that the decisions taken, including the new programme of work on Island Biodiversity, and the decisions on climate change and biodiversity, invasive alien species, business and biodiversity, forest biological diversity and agricultural biodiversity are reflected in our policies, programmes and research for the United Kingdom. This exercise will be completed over the next six months.
	One of the key delivery mechanisms for these policies are the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs), required under article 6 of the Convention. The COP decision to review the implementation of NBSAPs is opportune in the light of plans already in place within the UK to refresh the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, which is both a delivery mechanism for the CBD and a link from CBD to the devolved country biodiversity strategies.
	The decision on business and biodiversity arose from a joint UK Brazil initiative in partnership with the Secretariat of the CBD, Insight Investments and ILJCN—the World Conservation Union. We will be discussing with these and new partners how to take forward the elements of the decision requiring international development.
	I will be discussing the integration of biodiversity into official development assistance with the DFID parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the next meeting of the Inter-Departmental Ministerial Group on Biodiversity.
	We will continue to work closely with colleagues in Europe and the Secretariat to the CBD to support work on indicators and the development of improved outcome focussed reporting.
	Elements of some decisions will be implemented through existing EU measures, for example the recently concluded Regulation on Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade which strengthens efforts to promote sustainable forest management. In addition, existing EU legislation, in particular directive 2001/18/EC, already ensures a precautionary! Approach to the use of Genetically Modified Organisms (including Genetically Modified Trees and Genetic Use Restriction Technologies).We will continue to provide additional financial resources to support countries rich in biodiversity in the implementation of the CBD through the UK's substantial contribution to the Global Environment Facility (currently £118 million for 2002-2006, of which approximately 30 per cent. goes to Biodiversity projects) and through the Darwin Initiative.
	We will also support capacity building efforts over the inter-sessional period leading up to COP 9 in 2008 through DEFRA's World Summit on Sustainable Development Implementation Fund and through DEFRA's support for the Convention's Trust Funds. We will be focussing such efforts particularly on Africa and on support for implementation, particularly through national biodiversity strategies and action plans.

Natural England

James Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the number of hectares of land which would be owned by Natural England; what percentage of this land is dedicated for open air recreation under section 16 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000; and what plans exist for dedicating the remaining land.

Barry Gardiner: We envisage that the majority of Natural England's land holding will comprise National Nature Reserves (NNRs). NNRs cover approximately 89,800 hectares, of which 62,300 hectares are managed by English Nature, the remainder being managed by Approved Bodies. Of the land managed by English Nature, 19,641 hectares are owned and hence qualify for owner-dedication under section 16 (s16) of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. Some 27,935 ha of all NNRs (whether managed by English Nature or by an Approved Body) are already mapped as access I and under the CRoW Act. No NNRs are currently dedicated under s16 of CRoW, although the first such dedication will follow shortly, prior to the vesting of Natural England. The Board of Natural England has not yet considered its policy on s16 dedication.

1921 Census

Mike Hancock: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer under what statutory authority the Registrar General retained the 1921 decennial census for England and Wales in his Department between1 January 1959 and 16 January 1985; and if he will make a statement.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician and Registrar General for England and Wales I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking under what statutory authority the Registrar General retained the 1921 decennial census for England and Wales in his Department between 1 January 1959 and 16 January 1985. (67180)
	In 1958 the Public Records Act was passed and Section 3(4) specified a requirement to transfer records to the Public Record Office not later than 30 years after their creation. However advice received at that time was that the statutory prohibition on disclosure prescribed by the Census Act 1920 overcame the requirement.
	Subsequently the Registrar General wished the retention of the returns in his custody to be covered by formal approval and this was obtained from the Lord Chancellor in 1985.

Birth Statistics

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what forecast he has made of the number of live births per 1,000 of population in (a) East Sussex and (b) Eastbourne in each of the next five years.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated May 2006
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question regarding the forecast of the number of live births per 1,000 of population in (a) East Sussex and (b) Eastbourne in the next 5 years. (68389)
	The attached table provides the projected crude birth rate in East Sussex and Eastbourne from 2005 to 2010. These projections are based on mid-2003 population estimates and are the latest projections available. They assume that local trends in fertility, mortality and migration over the reference period 1999 to 2003 will continue into the future.
	
		
			 Table 1: Projected birth rates in East Sussex and Eastbourne, 2005 to 2010 
			 Births per 1,000 population 
			  Eastbourne East Sussex 
			 2005 9.8 9.5 
			 2006 9.6 9.3 
			 2007 9.4 9.0 
			 2008 9.2 8.9 
			 2009 9.1 8.8 
			 2010 9.0 8.7 
			 Notes: 1. Based on the 2003-based sub-national population projections, the latest set of projections currently available. 2. These population projections show an increase in the size of the population and increasing ageing of the population. These factors lead to a projected decrease in birth rates per 1,000 population. 3. All detailed numbers on which rates are based are available on the National Statistics website. Source: Office for National Statistics.

Birth Statistics

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many live births per 1,000 of population there have been in (a) East Sussex and (b) Eastbourne in each of the last 10 years.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about how many births per 1,000 population there were in (a) East Sussex and (b) Eastbourne in each of the last 10 years. (68390)
	The latest year for which figures are available is 2004; the table below shows the requested figures from 1995 to 2004.
	
		
			 Live birth rates per 1,000 population 1995-2004, Eastbourne CD and East Sussex 
			  Eastbourne East Suussex(1) 
			 1995 10.4 10.5 
			 1996 9.3 10.1 
			 1997 11.1 10.6 
			 1998 10.7 10.5 
			 1999 9.9 10.0 
			 2000 9.7 9.6 
			 2001 9.9 9.3 
			 2002 9.4 9.2 
			 2003 10.8 9.6 
			 2004 10.7 9.7 
			 (1) In 1997 Brighton CD and Hove CD ceased to form part of East Sussex. To aid comparability they have been excluded throughout the table

Birth Statistics

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) live births and (b) still births have occurred at (i) Eastbourne district general hospital and (ii) the Conquest hospital, Hastings, in each of the last 10 years.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question regarding the forecast of the number of live births per 1,000 of population in (a) East Sussex and (b) Eastbourne in the next 5 years. (68399)
	The attached table provides the projected crude birth rate in East Sussex and Eastbourne from 2005 to 2010. These projections are based on mid-2003 population estimates and are the latest projections available. They assume that local trends in fertility, mortality and migration over the reference period 1999 to 2003 will continue into the future.
	
		
			 Table 1: Projected birth rates in East Sussex and Eastbourne, 2005 to 2010 
			 Births per 1,000 population 
			  Eastbourne East Sussex 
			 2005 9.8 9.5 
			 2006 9.6 9.3 
			 2007 9.4 9.0 
			 2008 9.2 8.9 
			 2009 9.1 8.8 
			 2010 9.0 8.7 
			 Notes:1. Based on the 2003-based subnational population projections, the latest set of projections currently available.2. These population projections show an increase in the size of the population and increasing ageing of the population. These factors lead to a projected decrease in birth rates per 1,000 population.3. All detailed numbers on which rates are based are available on the National Statistics website.Source: Office for National Statistics

Bowel Cancer

Jim Cousins: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the (a) incidence and (b) survival rate was for bowel cancer in each (i) goverment office region and (ii) strategic health authority area in each of the last three years, broken down by sex and age.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking what the (a) incidence and (b) survival rate was for bowel cancer in each (i) government office region and (ii) strategic health authority area in each of the last three years, broken down by sex and age.
	The most recent available figures for newly diagnosed cases of colorectal (bowel) cancer registered in England are for the year 2003. Incidence rates by Government Office Region and by sex, in each year between 2001 and 2003, are published in Table 5 of the Annual Reference Volume, Cancer statistics: Registrations, Series MB1. These are available on the National Statistics website:
	http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=8843&Pos=l&ColRank=2&Rank=272
	Numbers of newly diagnosed cases and indirectly standardised ratios (SRRs) are available by Strategic Health Authority and by sex for the years 1993 to 2002. These can be found on the Clinical and Health Outcomes Knowledge Base website:
	http://www.nchod.nhs.uk/.
	The latest available one-year and five-year survival rates by Government Office Region and Strategic Health Authority for cancer of the colon, are for adult patients diagnosed during 1995-1997 and followed up to the end of 2002. These were published on the National Statistics website on 21st April 2005, and are available at:
	http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=11991&Pos=4&ColRank=1&Rank=272.
	Figures are not available for colorectal (bowel) cancer or cancer of the rectum. Figures by age are only available at England level.

Prostate Cancer

David Laws: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his estimate is of the number of cases of prostate cancer in each English county for each year from 1990-91 to 2006-07; and if he will make a statement.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking what the estimate is of the number of cases of prostate cancer in each English county for each year from 1990-91 to 2006-07.
	The most recent available figures for newly diagnosed cases of prostate cancer registered in England are for the year 2003. I am placing a table in the House of Commons Library, which gives figures by local authority for the years 1990-2003.

Staff Discipline

David Simpson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people in his Department have been (a) disciplined and (b) dismissed for (i) inappropriate use of the internet while at work and (ii) using work telephones to access premium rate numbers in each of the last five years.

John Healey: Prior to 2005, the Treasury only kept records of disciplinary cases that were proven. Information on disciplinary cases that were initiated but not proven is not available. The number of people who were (a) disciplined for inappropriate use of the internet while at work in each of the last five years was as follows:
	
		
			  Disciplined 
			 2001 1 
			 2002 — 
			 2003 — 
			 2004 2 
			 2005 (1)2 
			 (1) The employees concerned resigned during the disciplinary investigation. 
		
	
	No employees were dismissed for this reason.
	The number of people who have been (a) disciplined and (b) dismissed for using work telephones to access premium rate numbers in each of the last five yearsis nil.

Suicide

Norman Baker: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people have committed suicide in each year since 1997, broken down by method used.

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.
	Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 9 May 2006
	As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many people have committed suicide in each year since 1997, broken down by method used. (68637)
	The most recent year for which figures are available is 2004. The attached table shows the number of deaths with a verdict of suicide or undetermined intent, by method of injury in England and Wales for the years 1997 to 2004.
	
		
			 Number of deaths from suicide(1) and injury of undetermined intent(2) by method of injury(3), England and Wales, 1997 to 2004(4) 
			 Method of injury 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 
			 Hanging, strangulation and suffocation 1,663 2,028 2,079 1,999 1,877 1,994 1,921 2,057 
			 Drug-related poisoning 1,455 1,355 1,352 1,278 1,248 1,129 1,159 1,150 
			 "Other" poisoning(5) 721 607 570 435 375 353 326 252 
			 Drowning 253 291 283 270 262 257 249 235 
			 Jumping from a high place 139 144 128 158 150 164 166 154 
			 Firearms and explosives 115 125 130 122 111 102 111 95 
			 Contact with sharp object 77 90 86 99 88 105 126 128 
			 Other and unspecified 558 514 560 561 594 561 601 533 
			 Total 4,981 5,154 5,188 4,922 4,705 4,665 4,659 4,604 
			 (1 )The cause of death for suicide was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes E950-E959 for 1997 to 2000 and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes X60-X84 for the years 2001 to 2004. (2) The cause of death for undetermined intent was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes E980-E989 excluding E988.8 for the years 1997 to 2000 and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes Y10-Y34 excluding Y33.9 pending verdicts for the years 2001 to 2004. (3) The methods of injury were defined using the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes in the following list and were taken from an article published in Health Statistics Quarterly 20*: Hanging, strangulation and suffocation, ICD-9 E953, E983 ICD-10 X70, Y20  Drug-related poisoning, ICD-9 E950.0-E950.5, E980.0-E980.5, ICD-10 X60-X64, Y10-Y14  "Other" poisoning, ICD-9 E950.6-E950.9, E951-E952, E980.6-E980.9, E981-E982, ICD-10 X65-X69, Y15-Y19  Drowning ICD-9 E954, E984 ICD-10 X71, Y21 Jumping from a high place ICD-9 E957, E987 ICD-10 X80, Y30 Firearms and explosives ICD-9 E955, E985 ICD-10 X72-X75, Y22-Y25 Contact with sharp objects ICD-9 E956, E986 ICD-10 X78, Y28 (4) Figures are for deaths occurring in each calendar year. (5) Includes motor vehicle exhaust gas. * Brock A, Griffiths C (2003) Trends in suicide by method in England and Wales, 1979 to 2001. Health Statistics Quarterly 20, 7-18.

Developing Countries (Corruption)

Anne Moffat: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps his Department is taking to tackle corruption in developing countries.

Hilary Benn: DFID is committed to tackling corruption. It is a problem in most countries, and is a result of failures in governance and accountability. The best check against corruption is to strengthen governance, supported by regular monitoring. We need to focus on building policies and institutions that prevent and deter corruption before it undermines development. DFID programmes include support for a range of governance reforms which are aimed primarily at improving accountability, transparency and the improved financial management of public resources. DFID is also promoting work internationally to develop better indicators that will help track progress over time.
	A key part of DFID's work with developing country governments is to support the improvement of strategic planning and public financial management. For example, DFID supports public-financial management reform in Zambia, Rwanda, Malawi, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Lesotho and the Gambia. Procurement reform is particularly important and DFID works closely with other bilateral donors and multilateral institutions (especially the World Bank) to improve countries' procurement capacity. Many DFID programmes are also supporting reform of public-service pay, conditions and performance management, in order to reduce the incentives for public officials to act corruptly.
	DFID also provides support to a wide range of institutions in developing countries, working to tackle corruption and improve the effectiveness of aid and domestic resources to maximise service delivery and benefits to poor people DFID has provided technical and financial support to dedicated anti-corruption commissions, for example in Sierra Leone, Malawi, Uganda and Zambia. In addition work is under way to help improve citizens' capacity to hold governments to account for the way funds are used, by strengthening institutions such as parliaments, parliamentary committees and supreme audit institutions.
	Corruption is not just a developing country problem. Developed countries carry an equal responsibility. The UK Government are strongly committed to combating overseas corruption and have taken a number of steps including action to reform the UK domestic legal framework and providing support to developing countries to strengthen their own systems. DFID, working with other government departments, has launched the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative to improve the transparency of oil and mineral revenues. The UK also played an important role in negotiations to develop the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), the first global agreement on the action that needs to be taken to combat corruption. The UK formally ratified the convention on 9 February this year and became only the second G8 country to have done so.

Palestinian Territories

Ian Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on increased funding to the Palestinian territories through the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

Hilary Benn: DFID provided £15 million to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in April 2006. This will help UNRWA continue to provide health, education, job creation and other essential programmes for Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. We provided a similar level of assistance through UNRWA in 2005.
	Since 2004, DFID has provided a total of £47.2 million for UNRWA's work to support the basic needs of Palestinian refugees.

Pygmies (Congo Basin)

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps are being taken by his Department to provide support for pygmies in the Congo basin who have been affected by conflict.

Hilary Benn: In 2005-06, DFID provided £29.5 million in assistance to meet humanitarian needs in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) out of a total programme of £55 million. We do not earmark our assistance specifically for particular ethnic groups so cannot say what proportion of this would have benefited pygmies. In addition to humanitarian assistance, the majority of our programme is focused on successful completion of the transition process and peace-building activities aimed at reducing the risks of conflict. These activities along with a major diplomatic effort are aimed at seeing a permanent end to the conflict in the DRC that has had such a devastating impact on the people including pygmies.
	In 2004-05, we also provided £500,000 in assistance to meet humanitarian needs in the Republic of Congo (Congo Brazzaville), also not targeted to any particular ethnic groups.

Sexual Violence

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps are being taken by his Department (a) to reduce the incidence of sexual violence in Democratic Republic of the Congo and (b) to improve the status of women in society.

Hilary Benn: We are concerned about the continuing reports of wide-scale sexual violence in the DRC, primarily against women, though also against significant numbers of children and men too. Rape seems to have become a weapon of war among armed groups. The prevailing culture of impunity, which creates the conditions for ongoing human rights violations, persists in the great lakes region.
	The UK is working with the international community at different levels to deal with causes and symptoms of this, and has raised the issue with the Congolese authorities at all levels on many occasions, reminding them of the need to protect the rights of all vulnerable groups and for judicial action to be taken to bring the perpetrators of such abuses to justice. Specifically, as a member of the International Committee to Support the Transition (CIAT), the UK has joined the international community in highlighting abuses perpetrated by the Congolese army against the civilian population.
	To end the cycle of human rights violations in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), there needs to be an end to conflict in the country and the whole great lakes region. Conflict reduction is a major focus of the UK's engagement in DRC, and at a local level in the East we support NGOs who are promoting dialogue and peace building work between communities previously in conflict, with a total commitment of £3.3 million.
	In addition, all the projects within this peace building programme try to tackle many of the underlying causes of sexual violence and to enhance women's status in society by working with women's organisations. One example of this type of work is International Alert's support for the South Kivu Women's Forum, which brings together women's organisations from community groups to women politicians to work for women's empowerment and peace.
	Other areas of our work aim to address other aspects of women's empowerment. For example we are providing support of £800,000 to the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) to ensure women's full participation in the electoral process, both as candidates and voters.

Sierra Leone

Geoffrey Clifton-Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what percentage of the population of Sierra Leone has access to (a) free education and basic healthcare and (b) fresh water; and what steps he is taking to increase the percentage in each case.

Hilary Benn: There is currently no accurate or reliable data on the percentage of the population that have access to free education and basic health care services. The Ministry of Health estimates for 2005, indicate that approximately 60 per cent. of the population has access to health services of some kind. I refer the hon. Member to the information on 'gross school enrolment rates' in my answer of 13 March 2006, Official Report, column 1941W.
	On the percentage of the population who have access to safe water, estimates from the Sierra Leone National Energy and Water Policy Planning Unit vary from21 per cent. to 46 per cent. (Updated water data from a household survey will be available soon and DFID is supporting ActionAid to undertake a water user survey in the Freetown area.)
	At the end of the conflict in 2002, DFID agreed a country assistance programme with the Government of Sierra Leone (GoSL) which focused on promoting peace and security, and good governance. This, with poverty reduction budget support, has formed the core of DFID support to date. As part of the development a new Joint Country Strategy, DFID, the GoSL and the European Commission (EC) are reviewing existing country programmes. This will include an assessment of needs in the education, health and water sectors. A draft of the Joint Country Strategy will be available for wider consultation in July.
	In the meantime, DFID is funding a number of separate initiatives across all three sectors. These include:
	providing support to implement a Malaria Outreach programme;
	undertaking preparatory work with the National Energy and Water Policy Planning Unit to support the National Water and Sanitation Policy. DFID is also financing a programme aimed at improving the effectiveness of state-owned enterprises, including in the water sector;
	through DFID contributions to the EU Water Facility a number of NGO programmes for rural water supply and sanitationare underway in Sierra Leone—with a total value of some€5.4 million.

Railways

Ashok Kumar: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much (a) GNER trains, (b) Virgin trains, (c) Northern trains and (d) First trains have been fined for late running of trains in each year since the introduction of the fines.

Derek Twigg: The penalties for poor performance paid by franchised train operators, together with bonuses paid where performance has been better than each company's benchmark, are itemised in the following table.
	
		
			 Incentive net regime payments by financial year 
			 £000 
			 Train operator 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 
			 Anglia Railways 303 302 288 (221) (329) (3,160) — — 
			 Cardiff Railways 298 (1,423) (59) (73) 217 — — — 
			 Central Trains 1,675 (1,651) (384) (8,804) (9,633) (10,910) (6,838) (11,348) 
			 Chiltern Railways (117) (276) (115) (467) (484) (846) (397) (189) 
			 Connex South Central / South Central 764 1,118 (1,020) (9,248) (5,978) (6,342) (12,828) (12,118) 
			 Connex South Eastern (974) (1,629) (2,040) (11,229) (5,746) (6,897) (2,895) — 
			 South Eastern Trains — — — — — — (2,998) (2,501) 
			 Cross Country — — — — — — — — 
			 Gatwick Express — — — — — — — — 
			 Great Eastern Railway (122) 541 325 (7,744) (5,579) (1,525) — — 
			 Great Northern Eastern Railway — — — — — — (2,902) (2,447) 
			 Great Western — (2.452) (2,175) (1,978) (5,408) (2,610) (2,020) (1,058) 
			 Island Line (24) (14) (20) (41) (9) (12) (17) (25) 
			 LTS Rail (later c2c Rail) 1,391 747 34 (477) (2,540) (430) 371 1,844 
			 Merseyrail Electrics 178 (114) (346) (796) (641) 276 — — 
			 Midland Mainline — — (18) (15) 87 — — — 
			 North Western Trains 2,078 238 1,982 (2,256) (3,455) (2,536) (1,448) (540) 
			 Regional Railways North East / Northern Spirit 1,331 1,761 625 (8,337) (7,611) (3,729) (1,111) (741) 
			 Northern — — — — — — — — 
			 Scotrail 6,986 6,280 5,402 (5,284) (9,999) (8,654) (2,820) (2,268) 
			 First Scotrail — — — — — — — (178) 
			 Silverlink 844 (199) (254) (2,879) (2,854) (447) (90) 294 
			 South West Trains (1,281) (3,933) (3,657) (10,648) (12,776) (11,471) (10,186) 6,726 
			 Thames Trains / First Great Western Link (572) (2,224) (2,046) (4,291) (4,069) (4,173) (3,990) (4,700) 
			 Thameslink (49) (270) (668) (4,337) (3,325) (2,904) (2,844) (6,473) 
			 TransPennine Express — — — — — — (50) (2,817) 
			 Wales and West 664 (378) 1,776 (4,497) (1,577) — — — 
			 West Anglia Great Northern (346) (452) (849) (8,833) (8,359) (6,380) (2,782) (1,767) 
			 West Coast Trains — — (67) (15) (12) (88) (476) (80) 
			 Wales and Borders Trains / Arriva Trains Wales — — — — (1,329) (2,425) 1,386 179 
			 Wessex Trains — — — — (1,115) (3,354) (2,094) (1,398) 
			 Total 13,027 (4,028) (3.286) (92,4701 (92,524) (78,617) (57,029) (41,6051 
			 Notes: 1. Figures obtained from published financial reports. 2. Brackets indicate receipt from the Operator. 3. Roundings can result in the total not being the same as previous published total. 4. Wales and West Railway and Cardiff Railway were superseded by Wales and Borders Trains and Wessex Trains on 14 October 2001. 5. 2004-05 represents the period 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005, with the exception of Arriva Trains Northern, which is from 1 April 2004 to 11 December 2004; First North Western, which is from 1 April 2004 to 11 December 2004; Northern, which is from 12 December 2004 to 31 March 2005; Scotrail, which is from 1 April 2004 to 16 October 2004; and First Scotrail, 17 October 2004 to 31 March 2005. 6. 2003-04 represents the period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004, with the exception of Arriva Trains Wales, which is from 8 December 2003 to 31 March 2004; South Eastern Trains, which is from 9 November 2003 to 31 March 2004; TransPennine Express, which is from 2 February 2004 to. 31 March 2004. 7. Merseyrail no longer franchised from July 2003.

NGOs (Financial Initiatives)

Andrew Love: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what initiatives his Department and its non-departmental bodies support to promote (a) financial education, (b) financial advice, (c) financial inclusion and (d) financial capability; which organisations are involved in delivering each initiative; and how much funding is provided for each by (i) his Department and its non-departmental public bodies, (ii) other Government departments, (iii) the private sector and (iv) the voluntary sector.

Bridget Prentice: The Legal Services Commission (an NDPB of the Department for Constitutional Affairs) is working with the Department for Trade and Industry and Department of Work and Pensions as part of a national agenda to tackle rising levels of debt. The Commission is currently piloting a number of innovative new advice services to help people facing financial exclusion, following a £6 million grant from the Treasury's Financial Inclusion Fund.
	During 2004-05 the Legal Services Commission spent approximately £17.5 million on specialist debt advice through its contracts with both solicitors and not for profit agencies.
	The Public Guardianship Office is an Agency of the Department for Constitutional Affairs responsible for ensuring the financial well-being of people who lack the capacity to manage their own financial affairs. It does this by supporting the Court of Protection (CoP) in the appointment of Receivers, and through the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney (EPA). The PGO also undertake checks to establish that appointed Receivers are carrying out their duties in an appropriate manner.
	Exceptionally, when no suitable relative or friend wishes to act as a Receiver, the PGO try to find someone else to take on this role, or as a last resort, the Chief Executive of the PGO may be appointed.
	In carry out its role the PGO provides practical guidance for people appointed by the CoP to make financial decisions for people who lack mental capacity to do so themselves. The PGO also undertakes awareness initiatives to inform the public on how to make provision in the event that someone may lose their mental capability—due to dementia, illness or accident—and may no longer be able to make their own decisions.
	The PGO currently recovers 82 per cent. of its full costs from fees, which results in approximately a net cost to DCA of £5 million of which £1 million is in respect to fee remission. This work is not an 'initiative' as such, as it is part of the core work of the Agency.

Healthy School Status

Andrew Murrison: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of schools in each local authority have achieved healthy school status.

Jim Knight: The information requested is contained in the following table:
	
		
			 Local authority Schools achieving health school status(1) (percentage) 
			 East Midlands  
			 Nottinghamshire 47.2 
			 Derbyshire 59.4 
			 Northamptonshire 39.2 
			 City of Nottingham 38.9 
			 Lincolnshire 31.2 
			 Leicester City 34.8 
			 Rutland 81.0 
			 City of Derby 90.6 
			 Leicestershire 42.7 
			   
			 East of England  
			 Norfolk 21.4 
			 Hertfordshire 33.0 
			 Luton 38.3 
			 Thurrock 43.5 
			 Suffolk 14.2 
			 Cambridgeshire 39.9 
			 Essex 47.6 
			 Bedfordshire 23.2 
			 City of Peterborough 66.7 
			 Southend-on-Sea 43.9 
			   
			 London  
			 Barnet 61.4 
			 Richmond-upon-Thames 66.0 
			 Barking and Dagenham 21.7 
			 Harrow 41.7 
			 Corporation of London 50.0 
			 Redbridge 35.5 
			 Haringey 50.6 
			 Lewisham 32.6 
			 Kensington and Chelsea 32.4 
			 Merton 43.6 
			 Ealing 38.0 
			 Islington 11.3 
			 Enfield 67.0 
			 Newham 31.2 
			 Hounslow 63.9 
			 Bromley 37.9 
			 Brent 27.8 
			 Westminster 22.8 
			 Croydon 12.6 
			 Wandsworth 48.8 
			 Kingston-upon-Thames 52.8 
			 Hammersmith and Fulham 61.1 
			 Waltham Forest 39.1 
			 Camden 26.2 
			 Hillingdon 61.1 
			 Southwark 28.2 
			 Tower Hamlets 21.2 
			 Havering 47.7 
			 Lambeth 25.6 
			 Sutton 37.1 
			 Greenwich 56.3 
			 Bexley 38.8 
			 Hackney 14.9 
			   
			 North East  
			 North Tyneside 84.5 
			 Durham 75.8 
			 Darlington 64.1 
			 Stockton on Tees 28.0 
			 South Tyneside 58.1 
			 Redcar and Cleveland 32.3 
			 Sunderland 46.2 
			 Hartlepool 57.5 
			 Gateshead 93.8 
			 Middlesbrough 53.1 
			 Newcastle upon Tyne 80.2 
			 Northumberland 57.5 
			   
			 North West  
			 Liverpool 92.6 
			 Blackpool 34.9 
			 Knowsley 51.3 
			 Salford 50.9 
			 Blackburn with Darwen 45.0 
			 Stockport 96.8 
			 Oldham 23.9 
			 Cheshire 50.3 
			 Halton 82.9 
			 Rochdale 58.2 
			 Warrington 44.8 
			 Bury 44.6 
			 Sefton 67.2 
			 Lancashire 44.2 
			 Wigan 75.9 
			 Cumbria 46.3 
			 Manchester 35.2 
			 Wirral 55.4 
			 St. Helens 74.0 
			 Trafford 41.4 
			 Bolton 39.7 
			 Tameside 43.1 
			   
			 South East  
			 Buckinghamshire 25.4 
			 Slough 86.0 
			 The Medway Towns 56.4 
			 Oxfordshire 28.8 
			 Wokingham 55.1 
			 West Berkshire 39.8 
			 Brighton and Hove 60.8 
			 Milton Keynes 14.0 
			 Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead 51.8 
			 East Sussex 55.4 
			 Isle of Wight 76.4 
			 Bracknell Forest 84.4 
			 Southampton 39.8 
			 Surrey 23.5 
			 Portsmouth 51.4 
			 West Sussex 56.2 
			 Hampshire 51.9 
			 Kent 26.0 
			 Reading 61.3 
			   
			 South West  
			 Bath and North East Somerset 70.4 
			 Somerset 53.0 
			 Wiltshire 36.0 
			 South Gloucester 60.3 
			 Bournemouth 75.0 
			 Dorset 45.7 
			 Poole 80.0 
			 Cornwall 51.7 
			 Devon 24.7 
			 Gloucestershire 64.0 
			 City of Bristol 41.6 
			 North Somerset 53.1 
			 Torbay 86.7 
			 Swindon 78.6 
			 City of Plymouth 57.4 
			   
			 West Midlands  
			 Solihull 56.5 
			 Walsall 40.4 
			 Worcestershire 30.5 
			 Shropshire 26.9 
			 Wolverhampton 32.2 
			 Staffordshire 45.7 
			 Birmingham 81.6 
			 Stoke-on-Trent 57.0 
			 Herefordshire 17.3 
			 Coventry 32.5 
			 Warwickshire 32.1 
			 Sandwell 51.6 
			 Dudley 69.2 
			 Telford and Wrekin 32.6 
			   
			 Yorkshire and Humberside  
			 Kirklees 43.6 
			 North East Lincolnshire 47.4 
			 Sheffield 35.1 
			 Calderdale 68.3 
			 East Riding of Yorkshire 53.1 
			 Bradford 39.7 
			 Leeds 50.4 
			 North Lincolnshire 70.6 
			 Wakefield 37.9 
			 City of York 21.9 
			 Barnsley 62.0 
			 North Yorkshire 34.4 
			 Doncaster 52.3 
			 Kingston upon Hull 72.0 
			 Rotherham 93.5 
			   
			 England 45.8 
			 (1) Criteria for achieving healthy school status was modified in September 2005

Pupil Exclusion

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much each local education authority spent on (a) excluded pupils and (b) pupils in (i) pupil referral units, (ii) behaviour support implementation programmes, (iii) inclusion, administration, assessment and co-ordination programmes, (iv) behaviour support plans and (v) other programmes intended to avoid exclusion of pupils in the last period for which figures are available.

Jim Knight: The DfES does not hold the information requested, as details of expenditure on behaviour-specific measures are not collected centrally. However, the following table details planned spend for each local authority in 2005/06 on: excluded pupils; pupil referral units; behaviour support services; behaviour support plans; support for inclusion; and, SEN administration and assessment. The data are taken from Section 52 budget collections.
	
		
			 The Education (Budget Statements) (England) Regulations 2005. Budgeted net expenditure by local authorities during 2005-06. Cash terms figures as reported by local authorities as at 27 April 2006. 
			 LEA number Local authority name 2.4.3 Excluded pupils(1) 1.3.1 Pupil referral units(2) 1.3.2 Behaviour support services(3) 
			  England 12,776,710 227,793,614 84,908,393 
			  
			 201 City of London 4,300 0 0 
			 202 Camden 120,000 1,236,817 501,227 
			 203 Greenwich 69,570 2,409,750 1,310,970 
			 204 Hackney 27,518 1,976,119 142,125 
			 205 Hammersmith and Fulham 19,287 1,594,894 36,287 
			 206 Islington 0 2,043,509 81,618 
			 207 Kensington and Chelsea 100,241 1,325,912 110,527 
			 208 Lambeth 0 2,019,284 128,995 
			 209 Lewisham 42,086 2,709,378 348,859 
			 210 Southwark 27,000 2,110,030 1,638,600 
			 211 Tower Hamlets 31,894 2,166,079 219,459 
			 212 Wandsworth 113,362 1,304,865 25,567 
			 213 Westminster 44,900 436,300 0 
			 301 Barking and Dagenham 58,870 880,966 350,400 
			 302 Barnet 0 1,017,638 0 
			 303 Bexley 11,000 1,502,000 364,000 
			 304 Brent 256,000 1,292,000 63,000 
			 305 Bromley 49,156 828,755 286,945 
			 306 Croydon 121,182 3,944,040 0 
			 307 Ealing 165,400 2,369,400 689,100 
			 308 Enfield 87,689 1,084,750 473,598 
			 309 Haringey 27,078 2,172,666 995,754 
			 310 Harrow 10,288 694,645 131,234 
			 311 Havering 30,893 915,180 513,490 
			 312 Hillingdon 42,030 73,323 195,071 
			 313 Hounslow 75,036 1,048,935 288,424 
			 314 Kingston-upon-Thames 59,690 386,765 144,666 
			 315 Merton 26,188 864,057 114,137 
			 316 Newham 0 3,248,868 466,116 
			 317 Redbridge 60,665 780,080 283,435 
			 318 Richmond-upon-Thames 53,300 664,300 146,800 
			 319 Sutton 19,614 768,034 399,458 
			 320 Waltham Forest 183,367 678,533 520,424 
			 330 Birmingham 256,560 5,595,720 690,633 
			 331 Coventry 61,322 818,752 292,127 
			 332 Dudley 235,546 2,258,734 148,478 
			 333 Sandwell 0 2,621,200 431,800 
			 334 Solihull 53,024 741,428 0 
			 335 Walsall 0 925,015 797,709 
			 336 Wolverhampton 80,700 2,820,200 1,379,700 
			 340 Knowsley 5,889 1,572,474 409,943 
			 341 Liverpool 704,179 1,557,993 843,691 
			 342 St. Helens 45,198 1,366,927 49,094 
			 343 Sefton 3,670 527,990 887,420 
			 344 Wirral 10,200 917,300 21,700 
			 350 Bolton 53,763 1,429,171 689,500 
			 351 Bury 0 1,693,100 75,300 
			 352 Manchester 594,090 952,795 2,472,167 
			 353 Oldham 11,631 938,581 1,239,990 
			 354 Rochdale 29,748 1,667,836 298,981 
			 355 Salford 89,032 2,242,012 144,578 
			 356 Stockport 54,803 2,180,329 750,456 
			 357 Tameside 0 1,039,150 287,780 
			 358 Trafford 0 432,164 264,097 
			 359 Wigan 142,738 730,306 378,801 
			 370 Barnsley 55,000 1,327,470 434,790 
			 371 Doncaster 107,970 2,645,840 1,414,440 
			 372 Rotherham 32,008 1,297,515 1,466,365 
			 373 Sheffield 10,226 2,373,669 688,569 
			 380 Bradford 83,708 2,380,356 550,514 
			 381 Calderdale 9,256 0 490,531 
			 382 Kirklees 58,200 1,482,000 462,500 
			 383 Leeds 53,560 4,129,050 965,950 
			 384 Wakefield 0 634,381 870,973 
			 390 Gateshead 117,820 752,106 440,876 
			 391 Newcastle upon Tyne 81,670 1,067,264 614,000 
			 392 North Tyneside 56,174 990,122 201,122 
			 393 South Tyneside 0 738,734 0 
			 394 Sunderland 171,296 1,134,469 349,555 
			 420 Isles of Scilly 1,500 0 5,508 
			 800 Bath and NE Somerset 42,123 0 31,643 
			 801 City of Bristol 81,939 2,034,901 569,001 
			 802 North Somerset 8,080 1,286,205 100,200 
			 803 South Gloucestershire 81,000 1,303,000 419,000 
			 805 Hartlepool 52,299 827,027 313,931 
			 806 Middlesbrough 23,881 2,316,725 332,938 
			 807 Redcar and Cleveland 77,359 493,666 285,900 
			 808 Stockton-on-Tees 31,717 1,198,292 407,252 
			 810 City of Kingston-upon-Hull 39,652 2,081,488 43,982 
			 811 East Riding of Yorkshire 80,794 533,500 540,848 
			 812 North East Lincolnshire 0 1,033,134 44,291 
			 813 North Lincolnshire 20,614 1,119,133 167,063 
			 815 North Yorkshire 208,658 705,699 0 
			 816 York 101,876 605,404 395,375 
			 820 Bedfordshire 154,237 1,129,267 148,305 
			 821 Luton 188,115 1,020,769 207,553 
			 825 Buckinghamshire 0 1,908,183 296,628 
			 826 Milton Keynes 79,630 747,648 1,122,608 
			 830 Derbyshire 196,296 2,025,609 3,717,365 
			 831 Derby 942 2,535,538 230,616 
			 835 Dorset 7,300 2,455,499 354,254 
			 836 Poole 17,667 415,365 21,886 
			 837 Bournemouth 45,750 663,096 220,820 
			 840 Durham 137,478 668,909 844,941 
			 841 Darlington 9,748 418,761 290,380 
			 845 East Sussex 16,586 7,254 154,930 
			 846 Brighton and Hove 2,940 100,000 30,570 
			 850 Hampshire 535,000 4,492,000 1,369,000 
			 851 Portsmouth 57,780 1,358,749 416,197 
			 852 Southampton 132,100 1,569,500 986,800 
			 855 Leicestershire 186,640 1,601,630 803,088 
			 856 Leicester City 125,800 2,438,800 161,800 
			 857 Rutland 4,892 0 0 
			 860 Staffordshire 204,310 2,241,470 1,274,750 
			 861 Stoke 25,000 1,093,383 207,710 
			 865 Wiltshire 10,568 2,428,851 725,877 
			 866 Swindon 0 385,805 896,567 
			 867 Bracknell Forest 121,251 571,717 232,774 
			 868 Windsor and Maidenhead 0 522,366 297,416 
			 869 West Berkshire 18,019 914,267 294,323 
			 870 Reading 78,490 1,176,427 362,838 
			 871 Slough 72,691 665,093 149,970 
			 872 Wokingham 40,401 610,840 207,994 
			 873 Cambridgeshire 36,484 2,133,683 2,303,625 
			 874 City of Peterborough 5,605 1,352,063 49,402 
			 875 Cheshire 3,112 163,207 1,150,909 
			 876 Halton 186,565 654,850 17,590 
			 877 Warrington 11,057 315,295 274,555 
			 878 Devon 26,000 1,597,000 399,000 
			 879 City of Plymouth 35,534 985,071 61,236 
			 880 Torbay 28,616 736,274 175,071 
			 881 Essex 37,980 2,625,434 2,323,695 
			 882 Southend 33,116 489,104 271,553 
			 883 Thurrock 56,644 1,472,893 0 
			 884 Herefordshire 29,888 722,228 107,325 
			 885 Worcestershire 236,354 2,752,589 553,070 
			 886 Kent 184,403 3,818,047 3,282,252 
			 887 Medway 54,401 1,658,268 1,023,769 
			 888 Lancashire 369,680 10,759,755 4,515,923 
			 889 Blackburn and Darwen 145,139 1,750,261 356,215 
			 890 Blackpool 40,210 1,589,941 367,068 
			 891 Nottinghamshire 162,434 2,875,604 1,569,374 
			 892 City of Nottingham 473,690 776,050 1,309,557 
			 893 Shropshire 72,670 547,681 40,790 
			 894 Telford and Wrekin 29,121 993,882 201,293 
			 908 Cornwall 0 2,851,674 604,132 
			 909 Cumbria 332,471 1,948,159 464,797 
			 916 Gloucestershire 0 730,566 1,213,393 
			 919 Hertfordshire 308,517 2,101,213 1,660,100 
			 921 Isle of Wight 49,175 420,546 213,595 
			 925 Lincolnshire 193,411 2,893,505 270,332 
			 926 Norfolk 99,630 2,860,360 1,510,253 
			 928 Northamptonshire 0 2,678,960 226,920 
			 929 Northumberland 90,880 259,180 506,030 
			 931 Oxfordshire 160,488 1,434,695 444,730 
			 933 Somerset 186,814 1,383,842 967,608 
			 935 Suffolk 104,262 4,323,335 1,470,951 
			 936 Surrey 226,805 4,267,356 1,815,720 
			 937 Warwickshire 0 3,405,919 9,554 
			 938 West Sussex 237,846 1,230,129 1,017,698 
		
	
	
		
			 LEA number Local authority name 2.4.4 Behaviour support plans(4) 1.2.5 Support for inclusion(5) 2.2.2 SEN administration assessment and coordination(6) 
			  England 5,034,984 47,841,841 67,546,224 
			  
			 201 City of London 4,300 0 9,700 
			 202 Camden 0 240,204 686,663 
			 203 Greenwich 10,080 0 721,939 
			 204 Hackney 61,739 97,484 39,140 
			 205 Hammersmith and Fulham 0 202,901 345,438 
			 206 Islington 8,169 122,940 215,065 
			 207 Kensington and Chelsea 0 224,714 0 
			 208 Lambeth 0 314,922 250,395 
			 209 Lewisham 0 339,202 0 
			 210 Southwark 67,680 304,960 1,127,009 
			 211 Tower Hamlets 14,418 205,395 416,818 
			 212 Wandsworth 5,394 213,265 602,734 
			 213 Westminster 0 0 872,700 
			 301 Barking and Dagenham 0 245,200 43,350 
			 302 Barnet 0 500,350 1,000,838 
			 303 Bexley 92,000 9,000 450,000 
			 304 Brent 116,000 74,000 790,000 
			 305 Bromley 3,500 94,311 656,628 
			 306 Croydon 25,544 0 177,024 
			 307 Ealing 51,900 0 576,900 
			 308 Enfield 12,603 437,786 654,808 
			 309 Haringey 164,909 53,821 497,053 
			 310 Harrow 0 263,760 0 
			 311 Havering 6,240 98,220 348,170 
			 312 Hillingdon 0 0 478,575 
			 313 Hounslow 80,934 56,129 527,122 
			 314 Kingston-upon-Thames 41,883 17,583 129,253 
			 315 Merton 28,182 438,690 370,482 
			 316 Newham 0 155,460 808,559 
			 317 Redbridge 79,645 74,479 518,515 
			 318 Richmond-upon-Thames 27,100 30,600 290,800 
			 319 Sutton 12,189 20,000 557,044 
			 320 Waltham Forest 0 31,507 0 
			 330 Birmingham 0 1,117,334 1,416,193 
			 331 Coventry 40,420 143,463 574,989 
			 332 Dudley 3,050 93,864 457,712 
			 333 Sandwell 0 0 56,700 
			 334 Solihull 0 37,420 177,678 
			 335 Walsall 18,418 0 423,121 
			 336 Wolverhampton 69,000 33,500 314,600 
			 340 Knowsley 0 1,791,601 202,193 
			 341 Liverpool 73,129 93,530 70,000 
			 342 St. Helens 0 0 354,078 
			 343 Sefton 251,200 33,950 70,000 
			 344 Wirral 4,000 175,000 356,700 
			 350 Bolton 10,687 290,598 245,135 
			 351 Bury 0 390,548 37,900 
			 352 Manchester 0 1,575,502 0 
			 353 Oldham 0 385,489 386,460 
			 354 Rochdale 20,357 57,960 308,139 
			 355 Salford 5,127 40,258 317,596 
			 356 Stockport 16,717 664,217 339,082 
			 357 Tameside 30,000 500,000 335,090 
			 358 Trafford 0 0 189,356 
			 359 Wigan 138,213 0 781,538 
			 370 Barnsley 0 909,500 309,250 
			 371 Doncaster 0 76,690 444,990 
			 372 Rotherham 3,168 369,743 49,621 
			 373 Sheffield 1,211 1,764,564 425,188 
			 380 Bradford 30,542 56,560 650,000 
			 381 Calderdale 2,892 0 0 
			 382 Kirklees 0 27,800 0 
			 383 Leeds 201,650 389,150 265,570 
			 384 Wakefield 0 399,074 206,220 
			 390 Gateshead 103,216 69,697 70,538 
			 391 Newcastle upon Tyne 45,200 0 73,440 
			 392 North Tyneside 0 121,798 248,269 
			 393 South Tyneside 0 535,234 380,265 
			 394 Sunderland 0 375,915 260,773 
			 420 Isles of Scilly 0 0 24,017 
			 800 Bath and NE Somerset 10,457 238,920 419,073 
			 801 City of Bristol 122,088 576,238 486,582 
			 802 North Somerset 27,140 469,355 261,670 
			 803 South Gloucestershire 5,000 313,000 490,000 
			 805 Hartlepool 2,975 120,429 66,019 
			 806 Middlesbrough 8,721 24,422 298,134 
			 807 Redcar and Cleveland 145,776 137,350 57,608 
			 808 Stockton-on-Tees 0 64,773 269,257 
			 810 City of Kingston-upon-Hull 0 35,466 0 
			 811 East Riding of Yorkshire 0 0 191,980 
			 812 North East Lincolnshire 33,324 0 181,044 
			 813 North Lincolnshire 10,271 216,467 82,918 
			 815 North Yorkshire 283,805 377,445 556,652 
			 816 York 170,836 89,577 53,585 
			 820 Bedfordshire 0 264,352 790,169 
			 821 Luton 20,877 223,386 210,970 
			 825 Buckinghamshire 0 254,508 1,289,787 
			 826 Milton Keynes 13,505 248,397 582,800 
			 830 Derbyshire 202,056 0 1,225,841 
			 831 Derby 0 56,772 307,286 
			 835 Dorset 11,300 22,800 634,600 
			 836 Poole 9,600 18,801 190,954 
			 837 Bournemouth 22,172 166,599 238,913 
			 840 Durham 6,556 287,502 755,299 
			 841 Darlington 17,783 30,130 165,387 
			 845 East Sussex 0 1,075,262 1,069,094 
			 846 Brighton and Hove 30,570 21,900 256,090 
			 850 Hampshire 174,000 31,000 1,815,000 
			 851 Portsmouth 0 32,715 253,303 
			 852 Southampton 0 321,101 89,000 
			 855 Leicestershire 116,846 0 592,496 
			 856 Leicester City 15,000 720,157 578,900 
			 857 Rutland 0 25,828 17,513 
			 860 Staffordshire 36,220 473,280 2,493,860 
			 861 Stoke 0 979,201 230,000 
			 865 Wiltshire 5,004 17,999 776,191 
			 866 Swindon 0 63,776 237,114 
			 867 Bracknell Forest 4,290 10,180 174,729 
			 868 Windsor and Maidenhead 3,760 68,998 237,650 
			 869 West Berkshire 34,394 25,020 89,358 
			 870 Reading 81,869 776,225 202,556 
			 871 Slough 249,968 134,503 40,850 
			 872 Wokingham 28,782 0 249,621 
			 873 Cambridgeshire 33,564 541,993 748,211 
			 874 City of Peterborough 160,899 153,973 79,958 
			 875 Cheshire 0 289,941 1,422,690 
			 876 Halton 0 147,760 165,790 
			 877 Warrington 27,728 34,530 345,302 
			 878 Devon 0 1,032,000 747,000 
			 879 City of Plymouth 17,405 262,037 229,132 
			 880 Torbay 9,804 96,938 187,160 
			 881 Essex 0 440,563 0 
			 882 Southend 19,870 225,191 259,010 
			 883 Thurrock 61,467 0 240,639 
			 884 Herefordshire 16,719 84,579 403,146 
			 885 Worcestershire 2,000 330,568 683,188 
			 886 Kent 0 5,3$6,452 1,847,436 
			 887 Medway 10,600 117,900 471,814 
			 888 Lancashire 0 361,700 0 
			 889 Blackburn and Darwen 0 45,871 227,805 
			 890 Blackpool 33,990 418,399 260,353 
			 891 Nottinghamshire 17,320 63,447 579,957 
			 892 City of Nottingham 76,205 245,754 59,335 
			 893 Shropshire 0 60,793 168,341 
			 894 Telford and Wrekin 20,800 266,923 243,123 
			 908 Cornwall 109,903 440,000 899,725 
			 909 Cumbria 36,099 335,125 949,205 
			 916 Gloucestershire 0 4,062,588 426,084 
			 919 Hertfordshire 63,994 523,167 2,400,938 
			 921 Isle of Wight 45,206 57,375 56,222 
			 925 Lincolnshire 25,859 1,414,222 1,075,972 
			 926 Norfolk 67,657 110,537 1,059,855 
			 928 Northamptonshire 0 87,100 836,450 
			 929 Northumberland 5,050 0 367,000 
			 931 Oxfordshire 98,259 1,081,136 1,599,823 
			 933 Somerset 10,000 416,567 1,498,028 
			 935 Suffolk 0 138,770 452,176 
			 936 Surrey 110,167 294,062 1,642,770 
			 937 Warwickshire 0 32,504 717,610 
			 938 West Sussex 66,868 1,870,700 0 
			 (1) Excluded pupils includes any planned expenditure in relation to the exclusion of pupils from schools or pupil referral units, excluding the making of any provision of education to such pupils, but including advice to the parents of an excluded pupil. Expenditure on PRUs should be recorded at 1.3.1 pupil referral units. (2) Pupil Referral Units includes any planned expenditure on the provision of education at Pupil referral units as defined in section 19 of the 1996 Act. Also includes any school standards grant income and expenditure in relation to PRUs. (3) Behaviour support services includes any planned expenditure on the cost of providing or purchasing specialist behaviour support services, both advisory and teaching. (4) Behaviour support plans includes any planned expenditure on the costs of preparing and reviewing behaviour support plans under section 527A of the 1996 Act. Expenditure on behaviour support services should be recorded above at 1.3.2. (5) Support for inclusion includes any planned expenditure on: the collaboration between mainstream and special schools and primary and secondary schools to enable children with special educational needs to take part in mainstream activities; the integration of children from specialist to mainstream settings and the provision of discrete services or projects to promote such integration. (6) SEN administration, assessment and co-ordination includes any planned expenditure on the identification and assessment of children with SEN and the making, maintaining and reviewing of statements under sections 321 to 331 of the 1996 Act. Also includes the cost of strategic management and planning of services to support the inclusion and attainment of children and young people with SEN, preparing relevant strategic plans and SEN administration, planning and co-ordination. Source: The data are drawn from local authorities' 2005-06 Section 52 Budget Statements (Table 1) submitted to the Department for Education and Skills.

School Finance

Annette Brooke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what percentage of the overall budget for schools was spent on (a) departmental administration and contractors and consultants and (b) local authority administration in each year since 1997.

Jim Knight: holding answer 2 May 2006
	The Department does not collect the information in the way it has been requested at (a). However, the following table gives a breakdown of the available data for(b) local authority administration. Similar data are not available before 1999-2000.
	
		
			  (1)Central administration (£) (2)Total education spending (£) Percentage 
			 1999-2000 382,997,357 22,112,093,232 1.7 
			 2000-01 368,846,719 23,713,133,097 1.6 
			 2001-02 388,643,297 26,087,492,215 1.5 
			 
			 2002-03 555,581,472 27,565,869,821 2.0 
			 2003-04 513,310,247 31,457,564,859 1.6 
			 2004-05(3) 560,717,875 33,294,983,910 1.7 
			 (1) Net current expenditure on central administration covers the overall management of a local authority's responsibility in relation to education. Central administration figures are drawn from local authorities' Section 52 Outturn Statement s and include expenditure on insurance and joint use arrangements. Central Administration expenditure is shown as a percentage of total education spending.(2) 1999-2000 saw a change in data source when the data collection moved from the RO1 form collected by the ODPM to the Section 52 form from the DfES, directly comparable figures are not available from this source. The closest comparison available would give percentages of 3.2 per cent. for both 1997-98 and 1998-99. 2002-03 saw a further break in the time series following the introduction of Consistent Financial Reporting (CFR) and the associated restructuring of the Outturn tables. The change in sources is shown by the blank row. Up to 2001-02 figures were taken from the net current expenditure before recharges row, management and support statutory / regulatory duties column. For 2002-03 onwards the net current expenditure column for the central administration line has been provided.(3) Since 2003 the Schools Budget has been separate from the LEA Budget.Note:Cash terms figures as reported by local authorities as at 28 April 2006.

School Finance

Annette Brooke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the education budget for schools was in each year since 1997.

Jim Knight: holding answer 3 May 2006
	The available information is contained within the following table. Similar data are not available before 1999-2000.
	
		
			   £ 
			   of which: 
			  Budgeted education revenue expenditure Total school budget 
			 1999-2000 20,898,167,000 n/a 
			 2000-01 22,847,836,000 n/a 
			 2001-02 25,225,703,000 n/a 
			 2002-03 26,791,292,000 n/a 
			 2003-04 29,685,101,000 26,375,484,000 
			 2004-05 31,782,676,000 28,378,783,000 
			 2005-06 34,181,710,000 30,656,061,000 
			 n/a = not availableNotes:1. Total schools budget and budgeted education revenue expenditure is drawn from local authorities Section 52 Budget Statements submitted to DfES. This is calculated as the gross elements of any grant lines plus the net elements of the remainder of the budget.2. Budget education revenue was split to show local authority and schools' budget separately from 2003-04 onwards.3. Cash figures are rounded to the nearest £1,000. As reported by local authorities as at 2 May 2006.

Truancy

Eric Martlew: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the truancy levels were in schools in (a) Carlisle constituency, (b) Cumbria and (c) England in each year since 1996.

Jim Knight: The Department does not hold data on the levels of truancy. However, the figures for the percentage of half days missed due to unauthorised absence (of which truancy forms a part) in maintained mainstream schools can be found in the following tables:
	
		
			 Percentage of half days missed in maintained primary schools due to unauthorised absence 
			  1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 
			 Carlisle 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 
			 Cumbria 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.16 
			 England 0.50 0.49 0.47 0.49 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.43 
		
	
	
		
			 Percentage of half days missed in maintained secondary schools due to unauthorised absence 
			  1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 
			 Carlisle 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.9 
			 Cumbria 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.75 0.82 0.94 0.97 
			 England 1.10 1.07 1.04 1.07 1.09 1.07 1.13 1.23

Indonesia

Iris Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations the UK Government have made to the Indonesian authorities about the situation of Christians in Indonesia.

Ian McCartney: We regularly raise human rights issues with the Government of Indonesia, both bilaterally and through the EU. We have made clear our view that freedom of religion is an important component of the democratic life of the country.
	Through the EU, we have made representations to the Indonesian Government concerning the death penalty handed down to three Christians convicted of masterminding violence in Central Sulawesi in 2000. On 14 November 2005, as EU presidency, we expressed to the Government of Indonesia the EU's regret at the decision to carry out the executions, and urged the Indonesian government not to do so and to consider the abolition of the death penalty altogether. The current EU presidency, Austria, followed this up with the Government of Indonesia in January in separate meetings with the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Attorney-General, and in a note to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The EU presidency raised this again during the EU-Indonesia Ministerial Troika meeting in Vienna on 27 March.
	We understand that the Indonesian Supreme Court had recently re-opened the case and that there may be further police inquiries.

Israel

Andrew Gwynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what proportion of Israel's Security Fence is outside Israel's borders as they existed in 1967; and if she will make a statement.

Kim Howells: In March 2005, the UN Office for Co-ordination for Humanitarian Affairs reported that 20 per cent. of the completed section of the barrier ran along the green line. The remainder of the barrier is routed on Occupied Territory.
	We fully recognise Israel's right to self-defence. A barrier is a reasonable way to achieve this. But the barrier's route should be on or behind the green line and not on occupied territory. The territory beyond the green line which Israel occupied in June 1967 is occupied territory. We will continue to raise our concerns over the barrier with the Israeli Government at all levels.

Son Jong Nam

David Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if she will meet representatives of Christian Solidarity Worldwide to discuss the care of Mr. Son Jong Nam, sentenced to death in North Korea.

Ian McCartney: holding answer 8 May 2006
	My officials have raised Son Jong Nam's case with the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea authorities. Due to diary commitments, my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary is unable to meet representatives of Christian Solidarity Worldwide, but my hon. Friend the former Minister of State for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs (Ian Pearson) met the President of its Board of Trustees to discuss the issue.

Cancer

Mark Durkan: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many children received cancer treatment in Northern Ireland in (a) 1999, (b) 2001, (c) 2003 and (d) 2005, broken down by (i) council district and (ii) age group.

Paul Goggins: The number of children who received cancer treatment in Northern Ireland is not available, however the number of children admitted(1) to hospitals in Northern Ireland with a primary or secondary diagnosis of cancer related illnesses is available by local district council and age groups and is shown in the following tables. The full 2005 calendar year's information is currently unavailable therefore 2004 information has been provided.
	(1 )The figures presented are for the number of individual children admitted (discharges and deaths are used as an approximation for admissions) to hospitals in Northern Ireland. It should be noted that if a child is admitted to more than one hospital in any year or over a number of years he/she will be counted more than once in the tables.
	(i) Local district council
	
		
			  Calendar year 
			 Local government district 1992 name (a) 1999 (b) 2001 (c) 2003 (d) 2004 
			 Antrim 6 6 5 5 
			 Ards 13 6 9 7 
			 Armagh 6 7 5 8 
			 Ballymena 11 6 5 8 
			 Ballymoney 6 <5 <5 <5 
			 Banbridge 6 6 5 10 
			 Belfast 30 27 24 34 
			 Carrickfergus 5 7 6 8 
			 Castlereagh 12 13 13 12 
			 Coleraine 5 <5 7 <5 
			 Cookstown 5 8 7 9 
			 Craigavon 8 12 11 15 
			 Derry 29 20 29 20 
			 Down 8 6 <5 <5 
			 Dungannon 7 7 6 13 
			 Fermanagh 10 <5 9 5 
			 Larne <5 <5 <5 0 
			 Limavady 7 <5 7 9 
			 Lisburn <5 14 11 10 
			 Magherafelt <5 <5 <5 7 
			 Moyle <5 <5 <5 <5 
			 Newry and Mourne 9 14 13 19 
			 Newtownabbey 11 8 <5 <5 
			 North Down 8 5 10 11 
			 Omagh 11 <5 6 8 
			 Strabane <5 6 9 <5 
			 LGD unknown 0 <5 <5 0 
			 Northern Ireland total 228 208 216 238 
			 Note: Please note that cell sizes that have a value of less than 5 have been masked in order to help protect confidentiality. Source:  Hospital Inpatient System. 
		
	
	(ii) Age groups
	
		
			  Calendar year 
			 Age groups (a) 1999 (b) 2001 (c) 2003 (d) 2004 
			 0 to 5 79 70 84 91 
			 6 to 10 71 56 61 66 
			 11 to 16 78 82 71 81 
			 Northern Ireland total 228 208 216 238 
			 Source: Hospital Inpatient System.

General Practitioners

Gregory Campbell: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the average number of patients registered per general practitioner in Northern Ireland was in (a) 1995 and (b) 2005.

Paul Goggins: The information is as follows: (a) The Central Services Agency only holds computerised archived data on registrations with a general practitioner from 2001; reliable data for 1995 is therefore not available. However, we can provide the data for 2001 for comparison.
	
		
			 As at May 2001 Number 
			 Total number of patients registered with a general practitioner(1) 1,768,473 
			 Total number of general practitioners(2) 1,050 
			 Average number of patients per general practitioner 1,684 
			 Source:(1) Central Health Index, Central Services Agency (2) Medlist Database, Central Services Agency 
		
	
	(b) The information requested for 2005 is provided in the following table. However it is important to note that from the introduction of the new General Medical Services contract in April 2004, patients have been registered with a general practice and not with the general practitioner.
	
		
			 As at April 2005 Number 
			 Total number of patients registered with a general practice(1) 1,794,104 
			 Total number of general practitioners(2) 1,086 
			 Average number of patients per general practitioner 1,652 
			 Source:(1 )National Health Applications and Infrastructure Services System, Central Services Agency (2 )Medlist Database, Central Services Agency

Medical Services (Complaints)

Mark Durkan: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many complaints have been received by each health trust in Northern Ireland in relation to (a) mental health-related and (b) general medical-related services in each of the last five years.

Paul Goggins: The information requested is as follows.
	
		
			 (a) Complaints received in relation to mental health-related services 
			  2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 
			 Newry and Mourne 7 4 3 8 5 
			 N and W Belfast 3 7 5 5 5 
			 Homefirst 14 21 37 31 45 
			 Belfast City Hospital 5 7 4 6 8 
			 Down Lisburn 24 31 27 25 21 
			 Royal Group 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Causeway 6 9 11 33 50 
			 Craigavon Area Group 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Armagh and Dungannon 16 13 22 8 8 
			 S and E Belfast 30 20 41 56 30 
			 Ulster Comm and Hosp 22 9 10 28 16 
			 Altnagelvin Hospitals 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Foyle 6 5 13 8 10 
			 Sperrin Lakeland 6 2 12 6 4 
			 Mater 10 18 12 7 14 
			 Greenpark 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Craigavon and Banbridge 11 11 12 11 16 
			 United Hospitals 0 0 0 0 0 
			 NI Ambulance Service 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Total 160 157 209 232 232 
		
	
	
		
			 (b) Complaints received in relation to general medical-related services 
			  2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 
			 Newry and Mourne 111 154 109 133 145 
			 N and W Belfast 153 123 145 105 138 
			 Homefirst 74 127 148 255 282 
			 Belfast City Hospital 191 156 106 189 145 
			 Down Lisburn 279 243 262 257 278 
			 Royal Group 590 657 490 415 623 
			 Causeway 299 411 495 422 406 
			 Craigavon Area Group 210 225 193 168 220 
			 Armagh and Dungannon 87 73 63 69 61 
			 S and E Belfast 220 185 229 228 222 
			 Ulster Comm and Hosp 493 391 350 354 278 
			 Altnagelvin Hospitals 173 234 200 229 213 
			 Foyle 48 65 42 70 61 
			 Sperrin Lakeland 87 80 84 48 60 
			 Mater 103 101 124 85 84 
			 Greenpark 281 188 132 144 203 
			 Craigavon and Banbridge 86 95 70 79 112 
			 United Hospitals 243 191 262 275 310 
			 NI Ambulance Service 148 168 157 181 144 
			 Total 3,876 3,867 3,661 3,706 3,985

Ministerial Visits

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many visits were made by each Minister in his Department in each of the last three years to each (a) constituency and (b) council area.

Peter Hain: Due to ministerial changes and redistribution of portfolios during the period requested the information sought by the hon. Member can be provided only at a disproportionate cost. I can however give the hon. Member the details he seeks for the present ministerial team since they took office and this is provided in the following tables:
	
		
			 Constituency visits?9 May 2005 to 2 May 2006 
			 Constituency David Hanson Shaun Woodward Angela Smith Lord Rooker 
			 North Down 3 2 1 0 
			 Lagan Valley 6 3 1 0 
			 Upper Bann 2 2 1 2 
			 East Londonderry 4 2 8 1 
			 Strangford 5 1 0 4 
			 South Antrim 3 0 8 1 
			 Belfast North 16 4 6 1 
			 Belfast East 10 5 3 0 
			 Belfast South 18 11 13 6 
			 Belfast West 1 2 2 3 
			 East Antrim 1 0 4 1 
			 Foyle 3 1 10 3 
			 North Antrim 2 0 4 3 
			 South Down 1 0 1 2 
			 Newry and Armagh 3 0 4 0 
			 Fermanagh and South Tyrone 1 0 3 5 
			 West Tyrone 1 0 5 2 
			 Mid Ulster 1 0 1 0 
		
	
	
		
			 Council area visits?9 May to 2 May 2006 
			 Council areas David Hanson Shaun Woodward Angela Smith Lord Rooker 
			 Moyle 0 0 1 1 
			 Ballymoney 0 0 1 0 
			 Ballymena 1 0 2 2 
			 Lame 0 0 3 0 
			 Carrickfergus 1 0 1 0 
			 Newtownabbey 0 1 4 1 
			 Belfast 42 18 34 10 
			 Castlereagh 5 4 1 2 
			 North Down 3 2 1 0 
			 Ards 3 0 0 3 
			 Down 1 0 1 2 
			 Lisburn 6 3 7 0 
			 Antrim 4 0 1 1 
			 Coleraine 3 1 3 1 
			 Magherafelt 0 0 1 0 
			 Cookstown 0 0 0 0 
			 Craigavon 1 2 1 2 
			 Banbridge 1 0 0 0 
			 Limavady 1 1 7 0 
			 Derry 3 1 11 3 
			 Strabane 1 0 4 0 
			 Omagh 0 0 1 2 
			 Dungannon 1 0 2 1 
			 Fermanagh 1 0 1 4 
			 Armagh 1 0 5 0 
			 Newry and Mourne 2 0 1 0

Ministerial Visits

Cheryl Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list his visits to Northern Ireland together with the purpose and duration of each such visit since 1 January.

Peter Hain: I refer the hon. Member to the following list of visits:
	
		
			 Date of arrival Date of departure 
			 9 January 2006 10 January 2006 
			 16 January 2006 17 January 2006 
			 30 January 2006 31 January 2006 
			 5 February 2006 7 February 2006 
			 9 February 2006 10 February 2006 
			 17 February 2006 21 February 2006 
			 24 February 2006 26 February 2006 
			 26 February 2006 28 February 2006 
			 5 March 2006 7 March 2006 
			 8 March 2006 8 March 2006 
			 20 March 2006 21 March 2006 
			 27 March 2006 29 March 2006 
			 30 March 2006 31 March 2006 
			 3 April 2006 4 April 2006 
			 6 April 2006 6 April 2006 
			 20 April 2006 20 April 2006 
			 24 April 2006 25 April 2006 
			 28 April 2006 1 May 2006 
			 Note: Reason for visits—Northern Ireland business

Ministerial Working Hours

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what average number of hours per week each Minister in his Department spent working in each of the Departments for which they are responsible in the last 12 months.

Peter Hain: The information that you requested is not held centrally and can be obtained only at disproportionate costs.

MRI Scanners

Lady Hermon: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many MRI scanners are operating in NHS hospitals in Northern Ireland; where they are located; and what their average monthly usage was in each of the last 12 months.

Paul Goggins: There are nine MRI scanners in Health and Personal Social Services hospitals. Details of the hospitals in which they are located and their average monthly usage, as provided by the Health and Social Services Trusts, are given in the following table.
	
		
			 Hospital Number of MRI scanners Average number of hours per month scanner is in use 
			 Altnagelvin Hospital 1 183 
			 Antrim Hospital 1 170 
			 Belfast City Hospital 1 106 
			 Belfast City Hospital Cancer Centre 1 (1)81 
			 Craigavon Hospital 1 160 
			 Musgrave Park Hospital 2 532 
			 Royal Victoria Hospital 1 264 
			 Ulster Hospital 1 121 
			 (1) New cancer centre operational from April 2006. Belvoir Park Hospital MRI scanner was in use for an average of 85 hours per month prior to closure.

Nursing

Iris Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what estimate he has made of the number of nurses in the Province who have left the NHS in each of the last 10 years; and what assessment he has made of the reasons why nurses in the Province leave the NHS before the age of retirement.

Paul Goggins: The number of qualified nurses(1) leaving the HPSS in the last 10 years is provided in the following table:
	
		
			 1 April to31 March Headcount Whole-time equivalent 
			 1996-97 1,104 925.37 
			 1997-98 1,297 1,090.22 
			 1998-99 1,120 906.73 
			 1999-2000 725 609.63 
			 2000-01 955 814.01 
			 2001-02 896 741.84 
			 2002-03 739 625.42 
			 2003-04 913 765.48 
			 2004-05 893 756.22 
			 2005-06 890 758.54 
		
	
	Information on the actual reasons for leaving is not collected. However, in addition to retirees, leavers may include staff taking a career break, those transferring to the independent/private sector or to the NHS in England, Scotland or Wales, and those leaving for other reasons such as family commitments.
	(1) Qualified nurses include midwives and health visitors.

School Funding

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the average funding per child was in each (a) grammar school and (b) other secondary school in Northern Ireland in each of the past 10 years.

Maria Eagle: Detailed information at individual school level for Education and Library Board schools is available from the published Outturn Statements for 1999-2000 to 2003-04 which are available in the House of Commons Libraries. Similar outturn information on voluntary grammar and grant-maintained integrated schools is not available as this is prepared by individual schools.
	The following tables show per pupil funding, by sector, for grammar and other post-primary schools, between 1995-96 and 2004-05 (the last year for which this information is readily available). Figures are based on information provided by each of the Education and Library Boards for their controlled grammar and other non-grammar schools, and by the relevant branches within my Department for voluntary grammar and grant-maintained integrated schools. Figures include both delegated and centre recurrent funding, but exclude special schools, capital funds and other costs such as milk and meals and transport, which are not allocated at individual school level.
	
		
			 Grammar schools(1) 
			  Funding(2) (£) Full-time equivalent pupils(2) Average per pupil 
			 1995-96 143,693,606 60,749 2,365 
			 1996-97 149,523,462 61,436 2,434 
			 1997-98 154,528,688 62,392 2,477 
			 1998-99 161,368,273 62,602 2,578 
			 1999-2000 170,893,174 62,847 2,719 
			 2000-01 183,865,573 62,956 2,921 
			 2001-02 201,553,192 62,966 3,201 
			 2002-03 208,006,222 63,076 3,298 
			 2003-04 223,467,549 63,385 3,526 
			 2004-05 231,509,292 63,643 3,638 
			 (1) All controlled and voluntary grammar schools (2) Includes some funding/pupils in preparatory departments 
		
	
	
		
			 All other post-primary schools 
			  Funding (£) Full-time equivalent pupils Average per pupil 
			 1995-96 232,383,540 90,150 2,578 
			 1996-97 246,685,733 91,056 2,709 
			 1997-98 250,207,239 91,306 2,740 
			 1998-99 257,052,959 91,837 2,799 
			 1999-2000 277,132,434 92,331 3,002 
			 2000-01 307,702,284 92,950 3,310 
			 2001-02 327,281,993 93,185 3,512 
			 2002-03 338,548,377 92,603 3,656 
			 2003-04 360,179,522 92,839 3,880 
			 2004-05 364,958,184 91,778 3,977

Sure Start

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what percentage of children are on Sure Start schemes in each (a) ward, (b) county and (c) constituency in Northern Ireland.

Paul Goggins: There are currently 25 Sure Start projects in Northern Ireland offering just over 24,000 children in the 0-4 age range access to health care and family support services.
	Table 1 shows the percentage of children on Sure Start schemes at Ward level. There are a total of 582 wards in Northern Ireland and Sure Start projects cover 107 wards.
	
		
			 Table 1 
			 Ward Percentage of children that are on Sure Start schemes 
			 Ardglass 44.81 
			 Ardoyne 0.87 
			 Armoy 100.00 
			 Audley's Acre 66.90 
			 Augher 94.12 
			 Ballee 35.59 
			 Ballinamallard 95.65 
			 Ballybay 65.70 
			 Ballybot 56.52 
			 Ballycolman 75.68 
			 Ballykeel 78.92 
			 Ballymacarrett 52.05 
			 Ballymote 47.26 
			 Ballynafeigh 46.59 
			 Ballyoran 69.75 
			 Ballysaggart 39.61 
			 Ballysally 49.50 
			 Ballysillan 21.25 
			 Ballywalter 89.95 
			 Blackstaff 65.66 
			 Bonamargy and Rathlin 77.78 
			 Botanic 54.62 
			 Bushmills 100.00 
			 Camlough 18.27 
			 Camowen 77.56 
			 Cam Hill 61.11 
			 Castlecaulfield 36.97 
			 Castleview 21.85 
			 Cathedral 35.45 
			 Churchlands 37.64 
			 Cliftonville 1.28 
			 Clogher 71.79 
			 Clonard 42.59 
			 Collin Glen 13.98 
			 Coole 54.97 
			 Coolessan 62.50 
			 Corcrain 52.31 
			 Creggan 17.51 
			 Crevagh 80.30 
			 Cross Glebe 45.37 
			 Crossmaglen 23.31 
			 Crumlin 20.53 
			 Culmore 29.26 
			 Daisy Hill 28.06 
			 Dalriada 37.82 
			 Drumalane 40.21 
			 Drumragh 77.70 
			 Dunanney 100.00 
			 Duncairn 17.95 
			 Dungiven 62.86 
			 Dunseverick 65.96 
			 East 75.88 
			 Falls 34.94 
			 Feeny 62.66 
			 Fivemiletown 88.19 
			 Glack 62.40 
			 Glencairn 30.83 
			 Glentaisie 76.71 
			 Gortalowry 37.45 
			 Harryville 90.48 
			 Highfield 22.94 
			 Irvinestown 95.92 
			 Island 71.43 
			 Kesh Ederney and Lack 95.80 
			 Killough 29.50 
			 Killyclogher 77.64 
			 Killymeal 49.59 
			 Killymoon 27.71 
			 Kilwee 37.96 
			 Kinbane 43.40 
			 Kircubbin 97.92 
			 Legoniel 1.51 
			 Lisanelly 77.74 
			 Lisnarrick 95.51 
			 Moat 25.83 
			 Moss-side and Moyarget 41.82 
			 Moygashel 44.53 
			 Mullaghmore 41.22 
			 New Lodge 18.23 
			 Newtownhamilton 21.35 
			 North 75.63 
			 Oldtown 62.35 
			 Poleglass 24.16 
			 Portaferry 83.56 
			 Portavogie 83.56 
			 Quoile 56.21 
			 Shaftesbury 46.26 
			 Shankill 29.89 
			 Shantallow East 61.47 
			 Shantallow West 61.26 
			 Sion Mills 75.60 
			 South 75.82 
			 Springtown 80.08 
			 St Mary's 50.65 
			 St Patrick's 29.89 
			 Strangford 74.80 
			 The Highlands 62.26 
			 The Mount 78.84 
			 Trillick 95.65 
			 Twinbrook 36.76 
			 Upper Glenshane 62.72 
			 Upper Malone 23.38 
			 Valley 41.29 
			 Water Works 23.67 
			 West 75.65 
			 Whitehouse 100.00 
			 Woodstock 59.38 
			 Woodvale 27.37 
		
	
	Table 2 shows the percentage of children on Sure Start Schemes at County level. There are a total of6 Counties in Northern Ireland.
	
		
			 Table 2 
			 County Percentage of children that are on Sure Start schemes 
			 Antrim 34.38 
			 Armagh 61.64 
			 Down 47.98 
			 Fermanagh 95.73 
			 Londonderry 55.79 
			 Tyrone 65.84 
		
	
	Table 3 shows the percentage of children on Sure Start Schemes at constituency level. There are a total of 18 constituencies in Northern Ireland. Lagan Valley, North Down and South Antrim recorded nil.
	
		
			 Table 3 
			 Constituency Percentage of children are on Sure Start schemes 
			 Antrim Coast and Glens 55.71 
			 Belfast East 65.37 
			 Belfast North 21.29 
			 Belfast South 48.62 
			 Belfast West 28.26 
			 East Deny 54.67 
			 Fermanagh and South Tyrone 73.68 
			 Foyle County 56.40 
			 Mid Ulster 41.91 
			 Newry and Armagh 28.05 
			 North Antrim 59.19 
			 South Down 44.23 
			 Strangford 88.37 
			 Upper Bann 61.64 
			 West Tyrone 76.49

Immigration Detention (Children)

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will ensure that children subject to immigration control have their needs represented by the Commissioners for Children and Young People in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Beverley Hughes: I have been asked to respond as I have ministerial responsibility for the Children's Commissioner for England.
	The Children's Commissioner has the general function of promoting awareness of the views and interests of children in England on all matters, and on non-devolved matters in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. This is a broad and strategic remit allowing him flexibility in the issues he wishes to consider.
	As immigration control is a non-devolved matter the Children's Commissioner has the remit to promote awareness of the views and interests of children across the UK in respect of this matter.
	The Children's Commissioner is independent of Government. The Secretary of State for Education and Skills does not have the power to direct the general work of the Children's Commissioner so would not be able to ensure the needs of children subject to immigration control are represented by the Commissioner. The Secretary of State can however, direct the Commissioner to hold an inquiry into a case where he considers that the case of an individual child raises issues of relevance to other children.

Prison Service (Covert Surveillance)

Henry Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many covert surveillance operations were deployed within each regional area of the Prison Service in each of the last 12 months.

Gerry Sutcliffe: For reasons of operational security, I am unable to list the information in the manner asked. However, the numbers of prison surveillance operations remains low, not least because there continue to be other effective ways of either obtaining intelligence or stopping contraband from entering prison establishments.

Prison Service (Covert Surveillance)

Henry Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what mechanisms exist to authorise the appropriate use of covert surveillance techniques in the Prison Service; and if he will make a statement.

Gerry Sutcliffe: Both public sector and contracted prisons have systems and audit trails to authorize staff to consider the use of covert investigative techniques. The policy, set out in function four of the National Security Framework, requires a local risk assessment to be undertaken to consider the necessity; proportionality; and potential for unintentional intrusion that may be caused by any covert operation, before it is submitted to the area manager for approval.

Train Fare Evasion

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been (a) prosecuted and (b) convicted for evading a train fare in each of the last eight years.

Liam Byrne: Data on the number of people prosecuted and convicted for evading a train fare is not held centrally on the Court Proceedings Database held by the Office for Criminal Justice Reform as prosecutions are brought privately by train operators.

Abortions

Iris Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many terminations of pregnancies were performed on (a) 13 to 14 and (b) 15 to 16 year olds in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement.

Caroline Flint: The information (for England and Wales) is available on the Department's website at:
	Data for 2002-04
	www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Statistics/Statistical WorkAreas/StatisticalPublicHealth/fs/en
	Data for 2000-01
	www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp%3Fvlnk%3D68%26 Pos%3D2%26ColRank%3D2%26Rank%3D640
	Data for 2005
	Will be published in July 2006.
	The Government's teenage pregnancy strategy aims to help young people delay early sex through its national media campaign and also improved sex and relationships education andsupport for parents in discussing relationship and sexual health issues with their children. However, it is very important that teenagers who are sexually active have access to contraception, including emergency contraception, and sexual health advice to minimise the risk of pregnancy or sexually transmitted infections.
	Between 1998 (the baseline year for the strategy) and 2004 (the latest year for which data are available) the under-18 conception rate has fallen by 11.1 per cent. The under-16 conception rate has fallen by 15.2 per cent, over the same period. Both rates are now at their lowest levels since the mid-1980s.

Autism

Steve Webb: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the Answer of 21 March 2006, Official Report, column 254W, to the hon. Member for South Cambridgeshire (Mr. Lansley), on autism, what assessment the Government has made of the reasons for the trends in the incidence of autism; and what steps her Department is taking to expand the provision of care for autism sufferers.

Ivan Lewis: In March 2001, the Department commissioned the Medical Research Council (MRC) to produce a report on the prevalence and incidence (epidemiology) and causes of autism. This was published in December 2001 and provides an authoritative overview of the current state of knowledge on the prevalence, incidence and causes of autism.
	The report considers recent studies which suggest a prevalence of autism in young children of approximately 60 per 10,000 population and finds that much of the headline rise can be accounted for by changes in diagnostic practice and public awareness. It is available on the MRC website at www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-autism-report.pdf.
	It is for local commissioners to ensure their populations benefit from improvements to the provision of care for people with autistic spectrum disorders using the increasing resources this Government has made available.

Autism

Lee Scott: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures are being undertaken by her Department to increase awareness of autism amongst health professionals.

Ivan Lewis: The detailed curricula for the education and training of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals in treating and supporting those with autism is a matter for the relevant professional bodies.
	The national directors of learning disability and mental health are commissioning a document to assist those working with people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This will clarify how existing policies apply to people with ASD and how these may best be delivered to this group.

Care Homes

Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment her department has made of the merits of including a value for money assessment in the inspection reports of care homes for older people produced by the Commission for Social Care Inspection.

Ivan Lewis: No assessment has been made. The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI), as the independent inspectorate for social care in England, is responsible for registering, inspecting and regulating all social care services, including care homes. CSCI works to maintain and improve the quality of care, to ensure the safety of service users and, if necessary, takes enforcement action to end bad practice.
	CSCI inspects local authority social services and awards star ratings, based on how effectively councils are meeting the social care needs of their populations. These ratings will include an assessment of councils' commissioning arrangements. Councils are responsible for ensuring they achieve value for money in their purchasing of services from care homes and CSCI's functions encompass the economy and efficiency of councils' provision and their value for money.
	The great majority—around 70 per cent.—of care homes are private businesses. Market forces, particularly with regard to local authority-funded care home placements, which account for around 67 per cent. of places, ensures there is price competition, particularly in view of the fact that there is currently considerable spare capacity, with approximately 9 per cent. vacancy levels in privately owned, for-profit care homes in 2005(1).
	(1) "Care of Elderly People—UK Market Report 2005", Laing and Buisson.

Children's Health Services

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many babies received hearing screening during the first month of their life during the most recent period for which figures are available.

Ivan Lewis: The information is not collected centrally. However, data is available from the director of the newborn hearing screening programme for the number of babies receiving hearing screening during the first 3 months of their life. Between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2006, 479,886 babies received a hearing screening test.

Children's Hospices

Andrew Lansley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list children's hospices which are receiving grants from the Big Lottery Fund; when this funding will cease in each case; whether she plans to increase funding for children's hospices from central budgets when Lottery funding ceases; and if she will make a statement.

Ivan Lewis: The table shows the list of children's hospices receiving grants from the Big Lottery Fund, and when the funding will cease in each case.
	The provision of palliative care for children and young people with a life threatening or life limiting condition requires a wide range of services provided in a variety of settings—home, school, hospital or hospice to enable them to live as normal a life as possible. It is for local primary care trusts (PCTs), working with local authority partners and stakeholders, to decide how these services will be provided; we have published guidance to support PCTs in working with local authorities and other partners, including hospices, to commission high quality services.
	The Government's White Paper "Our Health, Our Care, Our Say" (copies are available in the Library) reaffirms our manifesto commitment to double funding for end of life care to enable more people to have a choice where to die. For children this includes palliative care, quite often a life long need and not just end of life care. I will make an announcement about the manifesto commitment as soon as I can.
	
		
			 Children's hospices in receipt of lottery funding  
			 New opportunities fund  
			 Acorns Children's Hospice Trust November 2006 
			 Butterwick Children's Hospice March 2006 
			 Chase Children's Hospice August 2006 
			 Children's Hospice South West September 2006 
			 Claire House June 2006 
			 Cope Childrens Trust October 2006 
			 Demelza House Children's Hospice August 2006 
			 Derian House September 2006 
			 Donna Louise Trust May 2006 
			 East Anglia's Childrens Hospices June 2006 
			 Haven House Foundation June 2006 
			 Helen House Children's Hospice April 2006 
			 Hope House Children's Hospice July 2006 
			 Little Haven March 2006 
			 Martin House January 2007 
			 Pasque Charity March 2006 
			 Richard House Children's Hospice March 2007 
			 Richard House Trust July 2007 
			 St. Andrew's Hospice Limited April 2006 
			 St. Barnabas Hospice Limited July 2007 
			 Wessex Children's Hospice Trust January 2007 
			 Zoe's Place Trust November 2006 
			   
			 Community fund  
			 Donna Louise Trust April 2006 
			 Claire House Children's Hospice Not yet drawn down

Colonoscopy

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects the remaining four programme hubs in the bowel cancer screening programme to be decided by the NHS cancer screening programme teams; and (a) how and (b) where the public can make representations on the location and timing of future hubs.

Rosie Winterton: Five programme hubs across England will invite men and women to participate in the screening programme, send out the faecal occult blood (FOB) testing kits, interpret kits and send results out. 90 to 100 local screening centres will provide endoscopy services for the two per cent, of men and women who have a positive FOB test result.
	As there are only five programme hubs to cover the whole of England, these are being commissioned centrally by national health service cancer screening programmes. The national cancer screening team are currently assessing where the other programme hubs will be located and announcements will be made as soon as possible.
	Strategic health authorities (SHAs) were asked to bid last August for their local endoscopy units to become local screening centres as part of the first wave of the programme in 2006-07. Similar exercises will take place for the second wave in 2007-08 and the third wave in 2008-09. It is up to SHAs to decide where local screening centres should be located for the benefit of their own populations.
	We intend that all five programme hubs will be established, and around 14 local screening centres will be operating (out of a total of 90 to 100 for full national coverage) by March 2007.

Dentistry

Andrew Gwynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dentists in the (a) Tameside and Glossop and (b) Stockport Primary Care Trust have signed the new NHS dental contract; and what percentage this represents of (i) all dentists and (ii) those dentists providing NHS treatments under the old arrangements in each PCT area.

Rosie Winterton: Information is not available in the format requested.
	Information on the number of dentists who have signed the new contract and the number who have not signed is not available centrally. We do however have some provisional information that covers contracts. A contract may well be for more than one dentist so cannot be broken down further to individual dentist level.
	
		
			 Provisional management estimates in Tameside and Glossop Primary Care Trust (PCT) 
			  Number Approximate UDA(1) value Percentage of UDA(1)s 
			 Contracts signed 39 416,673 — 
			 Contracts rejected 5 10,845 2.5 
		
	
	
		
			 Provisional management estimates in Stockport PCT 
			  Number Approximate UDA(1) value Percentage of UDA(1)s 
			 Contracts signed 55 541,000 — 
			 Contracts rejected 7 29,000 5.1 
			 (1) Approximate Units of Dental Activity valueNotes:The information provided is not validated as it represents a snapshot of the position in early April 2006.A contract may be for either a practice or an individual dentist.

Dentistry

Tim Farron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were registered for NHS dentistry in Morecambe Bay Primary Care Trust in each year since 1997.

Rosie Winterton: holding answer 8 May 2006
	The number of patients registered with a national health service dentist in Morecambe Bay Primary Care Trust as at 31 December in each specified year is shown in the table.
	With effect from September 1996, the registration period for adults was reduced from two years to fifteen months from the date of the patient's last attendance at the dentist. Registration periods for children were also standardised at 15 months. This produced a gradual reduction in the number of patients registered with dentists between January and September 1998 as those adult patients who were originally registered on a 24-month basis and did not return to the dentist were no longer counted.
	
		
			 General dental services (GDS) and personal dental services (PDS) 
			  Registered patients 
			 1997 173,009 
			 1998 155,221 
			 1999 157,106 
			 2000 160,389 
			 2001 161,980 
			 2002 158,667 
			 2003 151,480 
			 2004 151,423 
			 2005 144,555 
			 Notes:1. PDS schemes have varying registration periods. To ensure comparability with corresponding GDS data, PDS registrations for established PDS practices are estimated using proxy registrations, namely the number of patients seen by PDS practices in the past 15 months.2. Data for 2003 and earlier do not include those PDS schemes that do not have any registrations, for example dental access centres, and is therefore not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005 data.3. The registration figures for 1997 are not comparable with subsequent years due to the change in the registration period to 15 months. Previously the period for adults was 24 months whilst children's registrations expired at the end of the following calendar year. The introduction of PDS in October 1998 and subsequent growth has also affected the figures.4. The areas have been defined using practice postcodes within the PCT, not the patient's home address.5. Prison contracts have not been included in this analysis.Sources:The Information Centre for health and social careBusiness Services Authority

Dentistry

Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what basis the number of people registered with a dentist will be recorded following changes to the system for such registration.

Rosie Winterton: Under the new arrangements, the NHS Business Services Authority will monitor the numbers of patients who receive care or treatment from national health service primary care dentists on one or more occasions within a given period of time, as has previously been the system for most personal dental services pilots. We are reviewing what time-period should be used as the main basis for this monitoring.

Dentistry

Brian Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of eligible dentists in the area covered by the Burntwood, Lichfield and Tamworth Primary Care Trust had accepted the NHS dental contract as at 31 March; how many eligible dentists had declined to accept the new NHS dental contract as at that date; and how many eligible dentists had not responded either way.

Rosie Winterton: Information on the number of dentists or dental practices who have signed the new contract and the number who have not signed is not available centrally. However, provisional information is available that covers contracts.
	A contract may be for more than one dentist so cannot be broken down further to individual dentist level.
	
		
			 Provisional management estimates in Burntwood, Lichfield and Tamworth Primary Care Trust (PCT) 
			  Number Approximate UDA(1) value Percentage of UDA(1)s 
			 Contracts signed 62 253,250 — 
			 Contracts still in discussion 0 0 — 
			 Contracts rejected 12 6,078 2.3 
			 (1) Approximate Units of Dental Activity value.Notes:The information provided is not validated as it represents a snapshot of the position in early April 2006.

Dentistry

David Evennett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS dentists were practising within the Bexley Primary Care Trust area in (a) 1997,(b) 2001 and (c) 2005.

Rosie Winterton: The information requested is shown in the table.
	
		
			 General dental services (CDS) and personal dental services (PDS): Number of national health service dentists in Bexley Primary Care Trust (PCT) as at 31 December in the specified years 
			  Number 
			 1997 88 
			 2001 90 
			 2005 99 
			 Notes:1. Data includes all notifications of dentists joining or leaving the GDS or PDS, received by the NHS Business Services Authority, up to 23 March 2006. Figures for the numbers of dentists at specified dates may vary depending upon the notification period, for example data with a later notification period will include more recent notifications of dentists joining or leaving the GDS or PDS.2. Dentists consist of principals, assistants and trainees. Prison contracts have been excluded from the data.3. The postcode of the dental practice was used to allocate dentists to specific geographic areas. PCT areas have been defined using the Office for National Statistics all fields postcode directory.4. A dentist with a GDS or PDS contract may provide as little or as much NHS treatment as he or she chooses or has agreed with the PCT. Information concerning the amount of time dedicated to NHS work by individual dentists are not centrally available.5. Data on dentists that work only in private practice are not held centrally.Sources:NHS Business Services AuthorityThe Information Centre for health and social care

Dentistry

Anthony Steen: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of (a) adults and (b) children are registered with an NHS dentist in each primary care trust in Devon; how many were registered in each category in 1997; and what proportion of dentists have signed the NHS contract in each health trust area in Devon.

Rosie Winterton: The tables give the estimated percentage of adults and children registered with a national health service dentist in Devon in the years 1997 and 2005. There is no information currently available on the number of dentists who have signed the new NHS contract in Devon. However, information on provisional management estimates is provided for a number of contracts signed in the Devon area.
	
		
			 Table 1: General dental services (GDS) and personal dental services (PDS): Number of adults and children registered with an NHS dentist in Devon primary care trusts (PCTs) as at 31 December 1997 and the estimated percentage of the total estimated population in England 
			  1997 1997 Estimate percentage of patients registered 
			  Adult Child Adult Child 
			 PCTs in England 259,054 98,742 53 69 
			 East Devon 44,563 13,710 (1)— (1)— 
			 Mid Devon 28,781 12,501 (1)— (1)— 
			 North Devon 52,581 23,153 (1)— (1)— 
			 South Hams and West Devon 35,418 16,513 (1)— (1)— 
			 Teignbridge 40,232 13,840 (1)— (1)— 
			 Torbay 57,479 19,025 (1)— (1)— 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 2: GDS and PDS: Number of adults and children registered with an NHS dentist in Devon PCTs as at 31 December 2005 and the estimated percentage of the total estimated population in England and Devon PCTs in 2005 
			  2005 2005 Estimate percentage of patients registered 
			  Adult Child Adult Child 
			 PCTs in England 17,705,593 7,040,445 46 60 
			 East Devon 40,577 12,768 42 54 
			 Mid Devon 39,837 15,165 54 70 
			 North Devon 62,459 24,412 53 73 
			 South Hams and West Devon 18,594 13,292 21 54 
			 Teignbridge 27,665 10,851 33 46 
			 Torbay 42,929 15,994 41 57 
			 (1) Not applicable. Population estimates are not available at PCT level prior to 2001.Notes:1. Official 2005 population data is not yet available. 2005 data has therefore been estimated using office for national statistics 2004 mid-year population estimates based on the 2001 census as these are the latest available.2. PDS schemes have varying registration periods. To ensure comparability with corresponding GDS data, PDS registrations for established PDS practices are estimated using "proxy registrations", namely the number of patients seen by PDS practices in the past 15 months.3. Note that the data on registration numbers for December 1997 is calculated on a different basis from subsequent years. The registration period for both adults and children in GDS was 15 months from 1 September 1996 (registrations expire 15 months after the end of the month of registration). Previously the registration period for adults was an exact 24 months while children's registrations expired at the end of the next calendar year. Therefore, data on the 15 month registration period is available from January 1998 for children and September 1998 for adults. The introduction of PDS in October 1998 and subsequent growth has also affected the figures, changes in the registration period from two years to 15 months impacted on the number of patients registered after December 1997. 4. The postcode of the dental practice was used to allocate patient registrations to specific geographic areas (not the patient's home address).5. Registration rates (i.e. the percentage of the population registered with a dentist) have been estimated by including registrations in the area of the dentist, that is according to the postcode of the dental surgery and not the patient's address. So the registration rates for some areas may be affected by some patients receiving dental treatment in a different area from the one in which they live. This can lead to figures being unusually high, even over 100 per cent. for child registrations, while other areas may have estimated rates which are lower than the actual (but unknown) proportion of residents who are registered with a dentist in or outside their own area.6. Figures have been provided by the Information Centre for health and social care. The data source is the Business Services Authority and the figures are based on the numbers of patients registered with dentists with open General Dental Service (GDS) or Personal Dental Service (PDS) contracts as at 31 December in each specified year. Prison contracts have not been included in this analysis.Source: The Information Centre for health and social care business services authority 
		
	
	
		
			  Contracts signed Contracts rejected 
			 PCTs A: Number B: Approximate UDA value E: Number F: Approximate UDA value Percentage UDAs 
			 Torbay 21 195,500 4 2,810 1.4 
			 North Devon 25 264,300 5 18,500 6.5 
			 East Devon 21 158,883 4 2,528 1.6 
			 Teignbridge PCT 28 164,172 1 12 0.0 
			 Mid Devon PCT 13 160,731 3 3,607 2.2 
			 South Hams and West Devon 22 95,000 5 3,500 3.6 
			 Note:A contract may be for either a practice or an individual dentist. The information provided is not validated. It represents a snapshot of the position in early April.

Enzyme Replacement Therapy

Jeremy Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the funding of enzyme replacement therapies for lysosomal storage diseases will continue under the National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group arrangements after 31 March 2007.

Ivan Lewis: It has not yet been decided whether the funding of enzyme replacement therapies for lysosomal storage disorders will continue under the national specialist commissioning advisory group after 31 March 2007.

Fruit/Vegetable Consumption

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average fruit and vegetable consumption per person was in the UK in each year since 1997, broken down by household income.

Caroline Flint: The health survey for England (HSE) undertaken by the Department collects data on fruit and vegetable consumption. Data is available for 2003 for adults and 2001 for children. This is shown in tables one and two. The highest consumption was found in women from the higher income groups eating 4.4 portions per day compared to the recommended portions of five portions.
	The Food Standards Agency's consumer attitude survey indicates that there has been a steady increase in awareness of the 5 a day message from 43 per cent. to 67 per cent. in 2005. Those claiming to have eaten at least five portions of fruit and vegetables the previous day had risen from 26 per cent. in 2000 to 30 per cent. in 2006.
	Fruit and vegetable consumption for adults and children, broken down by household income for 2001 and 2003 are shown in tables one and two.
	In 1997 to 2000, consumption of fruit and vegetables based on household purchases is available fromthe national food survey and after 2001, from the expenditure and food survey. Quantities purchased for 2001-02 to 2003-04 broken down by income quintile are shown in table three. Quantities for 1997 to 2000 broken down by income bands are shown in table four.
	These tables show that overall, households have not seen a huge change in the purchasing of fruit and vegetables. However, we have seen a significant increase in purchases from those in the lowest income quintiles. This group has purchased 33 per cent. more fruit and vegetables per week in 2004- 05 compared to 2001-02.
	
		
			 Table 1: Mean fruit and vegetable consumption(1) portions per day by adults(2) (age standardised) by equivalised household income quintile and gender, England 2003 
			 Percentages 
			  Equivalised annual household income quintile 
			  Highest Second Third Fourth Lowest 
			 Men 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.6 
			 Women 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.2 2.8 
			   
			 Bases (weighted) 
			 Men 1,390 1,419 1,280 973 1,036 
			 Women 1,172 1,365 1,424 1,134 1,285 
			 (1 )Consumption is calculated in 80-gram portions. (2) Adults aged 16 and over.  Source:  HSE 2003, Department of Health 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 2: Mean fruit and vegetable consumption(1) portions per day by children(2), byequivalised household income quintile and gender, England 2001-02 
			 Percentages 
			  Equivalised annual household income quintile 
			  Highest Second Third Fourth Lowest 
			 Males 3.0 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 
			 Females 3.2 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.5 
			   
			 Bases (weighted) 
			 Males 550 715 853 812 798 
			 Females 570 684 822 758 852 
			 (1 )Consumption is calculated in 80-gram portions. (2) Children aged 5 to 15.  Source:  HSE 2002, Department of Health 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 3: Quantities of fruit and vegetables, excluding potatoes, purchased, grams per person per week(1):()United Kingdom 
			 Average gross weekly household income (UK) 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 
			 Quintile 5 (highest income) 2,947 2,496 2,473 2,512 
			 Quintile 4 2,492 2,325 2,143 2,129 
			 Quintile 3 2,220 2,121 2,204 2,197 
			 Quintile 2 2,058 2,273 2,377 2,248 
			 Quintile 1 (lowest income) 1,667 2,217 2,049 2,210 
			 UK average across all households 2,248 2,307 2,269 2,274 
			 (1) Each household member over the age of seven kept a diary.  Source:  Expenditure and food survey. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Office for National Statistics 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 4: Quantities of fruit and vegetables (excluding potatoes) purchased, grams per person per week(1): Great Britain 
			 By gross weekly income of head of household(2) 1997 1998 1999 2000 
			 A 2,618 2,819 2,732 2,604 
			 B 2,157 2,196 2,170 2,214 
			 C 1,964 1,925 1,851 1,922 
			 D (lowest income) 1,798 1,647 1,840 1,775 
			 El (highest income) 3,036 3,198 3,072 3,245 
			 E2 (lowest income) 1,881 1,863 1,827 2,133 
			 OAP households 2,489 2,389 2,275 2,491 
			 All GB households 2,188 2,181 2,158 2,197 
			 (1) One diary for the entire household completed by person who does most of the food shopping.  (2) A, B and C are households with one or more earners; In 2000 A: £725 and over, B: £375 and under £725, C: £180 and under £375, El and E2 are households without an earner; In 2000 El: £180 and over, E2: under £180.  Source:  National food survey, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Mental Health

Sandra Gidley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health 
	(1)  how many care homes registered as catering for the needs of (a) people aged over 65 with mental illness and (b) people aged between 18 and 65 with mental illness there were in each of the last six years;
	(2)  what estimate she has made of the number of people aged 65 years and over who suffered from a sensory impairment in each of the last six years, broken down by sense;
	(3)  how many (a) care homes were registered for sensory impairment for elderly people and (b) places were available in such care homes in each of the last six years, broken down by local authority.

Ivan Lewis: Table 1 shows the number of residential and nursing care homes for people aged 18 and over with mental health problems in England at 31 March for the years 2000 and 2001.
	
		
			 Table 1: Number of residential and nursing care homes for people with mental health problems, England 2000 and 2001 
			  Residential(1) Nursing(2) Total 
			 At 31 March: Aged 18-64 Aged 65 and over All All 
			 2001 1,890 940 1,050 3,870 
			 2000 1,940 930 1,070 3,950 
			 (2) Nursing home figures are for all ages. Separate data for 18 to 64 and 65 and over are not available.  Note: Information for 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003 is not available.  Sources:  Forms RA(A)(1 )and RH(N)A(2), Department of Health. 
		
	
	I understand from the chair of the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) that the number of care homes catering for the needs of people aged over 65 and people aged between 18 and 65 with mental illness between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2006 were as shown in table 2.
	
		
			 Table 2: Total number of care homes registered for people with mental illness 
			  Aged over 65 Aged 18 to 65 Total 
			 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003 1,777 2,742 4,519 
			 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 1,907 2,523 4,430 
			 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 1,780 2,302 4,082 
			 1 April 2005 to 23 March 2006 1,752 2,255 4,077 
		
	
	Information on the number of people aged 65 and over who are suffering from sensory impairment is not available centrally.
	Table 3 shows the number of adults aged 65 and over who are registered as blind, partially blind, deaf or hard of hearing in England. Registration of blindness or deafness is voluntary. Therefore, the number of people registered does not include all people with a sensory impairment.
	
		
			 Table 3: Number of adults aged 65 and over who are registered as having a sensory impairment in England, as at 31 March 2000 to 2004 
			 Registered as: 2000 2001 2003 2004 
			 Blind 124,100 n/a 121,100 n/a 
			 Partially sighted 118,900 n/a 122,200 n/a 
			 Deaf n/a 19,000 n/a 21,700 
			 Hard of hearing n/a 116,100 n/a 126,100 
			 n/a = Not available.  Notes:  1. The information on both the blind and deaf registers is collected every three years.  2. Data is rounded. 
		
	
	I understand from CSCI that the number of care homes registered for sensory impairment and the number of places available in these homes, broken down by local authority, between 1 April 2003 and31 March 2006 is shown in table 4.
	
		
			 Table 4: Care homes registered for sensory impairment and available places, 2003 to 2006, England 
			  1 April to 31 March 
			  2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 
			 Local authority Care homes Places Care homes Places Care homes Places 
			 Bath and North East Somerset 1 22 1 22 1 22 
			 Birmingham 2 98 2 98 2 98 
			 Bradford 1 35 1 35 1 35 
			 Brent 1 21 1 21 1 21 
			 Brighton and Hove 1 44 1 44 1 44 
			 Cambridgeshire 1 38 1 38 0 0 
			 Cornwall 1 5 1 5 2 33 
			 Coventry 1 13 1 13 1 13 
			 Cumbria 1 38 1 38 1 38 
			 Devon 3 78 4 106 4 106 
			 Durham 1 40 1 40 1 40 
			 Essex 2 60 2 60 2 60 
			 Gateshead 17 559 18 592 18 578 
			 Gloucestershire 2 56 2 56 2 56 
			 Hampshire 4 160 4 160 4 160 
			 Hertfordshire 2 58 2 58 2 58 
			 Kingston upon Hull 1 21 1 21 1 21 
			 Leeds 1 6 2 11 2 11 
			 Leicester 19 605 19 605 20 622 
			 Leicestershire 23 884 23 884 23 884 
			 Manchester 2 45 1 32 1 32 
			 North Yorkshire — — 1 39 1 39 
			 Oldham 16 476 17 496 17 496 
			 Oxfordshire 1 103 1 103 1 103 
			 Peterborough 2 11 2 11 2 11 
			 Plymouth 2 67 3 88 3 88 
			 Salford 1 59 1 59 1 59 
			 Sheffield 1 30 1 30 1 30 
			 Somerset 1 40 1 40 1 40 
			 South Tyneside 5 196 7 305 7 305 
			 Southend on Sea 1 25 1 25 1 25 
			 Stockport 1 44 1 44 1 44 
			 Suffolk 1 16 1 16 1 16 
			 Sunderland 15 597 15 597 14 553 
			 Surrey 43 1,597 44 1,635 45 1,738 
			 Swindon 1 5 1 5 1 5 
			 Tameside 12 415 12 415 12 415 
			 Wandsworth 1 6 1 6 1 6 
			 Worcestershire 1 16 1 16 2 28 
			 Total 105 3,703 200 6,869 202 6,933 
			 Notes:  1. Local authorities not listed do not have care homes registered for sensory impairment.  2. Information on homes registered for sensory impairment prior to 2003 and the establishment of CSCI is not available.

Midwives

Diana Johnson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many vacant midwife posts there are in (a) the North and East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire Strategic Health Authority area and (b) the East Hull and West Hull Primary Care Trust area; and what plans her Department has to recruit more midwives into the NHS in North and East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire.

Ivan Lewis: The information requested is shown in the table. Individual national health service organisations are responsible for the recruitment of midwives. I am advised that Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust is able to deploy staff flexibly to cover vacancies, and is planning to recruit to five of the vacant posts. North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Strategic Health Authority is continuing to commission training programmes for registered midwives at the Universities of Hull and York in order to maintain future supply.
	
		
			 Health and Social Care Information Centre Vacancies Survey March 2005: NHS three month qualified midwifery vacancies in North East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Strategic Health Authority area by organisation—Three month vacancy rates, numbers and staff in post 
			   Midwives 
			   March 2005 September 2004 
			 Staff in post 
			   Three month vacancy rate (%) Three month vacancy number Full-time equivalent Headcount 
			 North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Strategic Health Authority area total Q11 4.9 21 558 709 
			 Craven Harrogate and Rural District PCT 5KJ 0 0 0 0 
			 East Yorkshire PCT 5E3 0 0 0 0 
			 Eastern Hull PCT 5E5 0 0 0 0 
			 Hambleton and Richmondshire PCT 5KH 0 0 0 0 
			 Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust RCD 0 0 47 59 
			 Hull and East Riding Community Health NHS Trust RV9 0 0 0 0 
			 Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust RWA 10.2 21 183 236 
			 North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire SHA Q11 0 0 0 0 
			 North East Lincolnshire PCT 5AN 0 0 0 0 
			 North Lincolnshire PCT 5EF 0 0 0 0 
			 Scarborough and North East Yorkshire Health Care NHS Trust RCC 0 0 72 80 
			 Scarborough, Whitby and Ryedale PCT 5KK * 0 1 1 
			 Selby and York PCT 5E2 0 0 0 0 
			 Tees East and North Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust RV1 0 0 0 0 
			 West Hull PCT 5E6 0 0 0 0 
			 York Health Services NHS Trust RCB 0 0 103 137 
			 Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT 5E4 0 0 0 0 
			 Three month vacancy notes:  1. Three month vacancy information is as at 31 March 2005.  2. Three month vacancies are vacancies which Trusts are actively trying to fill, which had lasted for three months or more (full time equivalents).  3. Three month vacancy rates are three month vacancies expressed as a percentage of three month vacancies plus staff in post.  4. Three month Vacancy Rates are calculated using staff in post from the Non-Medical Workforce Census September 2004.  5. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.  6. * figures where sum of staff in post (as at 30 September 2004) and vacancies (as at 31 March 2005) is less than 10. Staff in post note:Staff in post data is from the Non-Medical Workforce Census September 2004. General notes:  1. Vacancy and staff in post numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number.  2. Calculating the vacancy rates using the above data may not equal the actual vacancy rates.  3. Due to rounding, totals may not equal the sum of component parts.  4. The 2005 Vacancy survey did not receive a valid return from the Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust. Figures for this Trust have been excluded from all applicable vacancy totals and calculations. Staff in post figures for this Trust are included in the England, Yorkshire and the Humber GOR and North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire SHA totals so as to be consistent with other Health and Social Care Information Centre publications.  Sources:  The Information Centre for health and social care Vacancies Survey March 2005. The Information Centre for health and social care Non-Medical Workforce Census September 2004.

NHS Finance

Mark Simmonds: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what additional funding has been provided to implement Agenda for Change in the Trent Strategic Health Authority in each financial year since 2004-05; and what such funding is planned for each year to 2008-09.

Rosie Winterton: The funding for agenda for change is included in the unified primary care trust (PCT) revenue allocations that cover the full range of services commissioned by PCTs. It is for PCTs to decide how their allocations can be used in the most effective way.

Opportunities for Volunteering Scheme

Alan Whitehead: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what allocation of grants has been made from the Opportunities for Volunteering scheme in 2006-07.

Ivan Lewis: The Department of Health has allocated £6.7 million to its opportunities for volunteering scheme for 2006-07. Funds will be distributed through grants to individual volunteering projects by the scheme's 16 voluntary sector national agents.

Palliative Care

Francis Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the process is for commissioning children's palliative care; and what plans she has for the reform of these arrangements.

Ivan Lewis: "National Standards, Local Action" published in July 2004 recommends that primary care trusts (PCTs) will need to take into account specialist services, which can only be commissioned effectively on a pan-PCT or broader basis. PCTs, with the support of strategic health authorities (SHAs), are expected to act collaboratively to secure these services and their improvement.
	Last November, we published "Commissioning Children's and Young People's Palliative Care Services" which gives commissioners important advice about the key aspects of children's palliative care both general and specialist which will improve the quality of service provision and promote quality of care for children, young people and their families in a range of settings, for example palliative care at home, in hospital or in a hospice.
	On 22 March a series of eight regional events were launched to bring PCT commissioners, hospital and community services and voluntary organisations to promote local networks to commission and deliver improved quality and choice in palliative care services for children and young people.
	The Government's White Paper "Our health, our care, our say" (copies are available in the Library) reaffirms our manifesto commitment to double funding for end of life care to enable more people to have a choice about where to die. For children this includes palliative care, quite often a life long need and not just end of life care. The White Paper includes additional commitments on:
	provision of emergency, home-based respite care;
	expert carers programme;
	carers helpline, where the hospice movement will play an important role; and
	an audit of services by PCTs against the national service framework standard for disable children and young people and those with complex health needs, agreeing funding, models of service and commissioning arrangements with SHAs.

Photodynamic Therapy

John Baron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health 
	(1)  what steps she is taking (a) to raise awareness and (b) to promote the use of photodynamic therapy for skin cancer patients;
	(2)  what plans she has to ask the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to issue further guidance on the use of photodynamic therapy for skin cancer patients;
	(3)  what assessment she has made of (a) the relative costs and (b) the patient benefits of (i) photodynamic therapy treatment and (ii) other treatment options for skin cancer patients;
	(4)  what plans she has to commission research into the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for skin cancer patients.

Rosie Winterton: holding answer 8 May 2006
	It is the responsibility of clinicians to discuss with patients appropriate treatment options for their particular condition. However, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) was set up in 1999 to issue clinical guidance to support the national health service including: interventional procedure guidance to assess if a procedure is safe for routine use in the NHS; technology appraisals to assess if a treatment is clinically and cost effective; clinical guidelines to advise on the diagnosis and management of certain conditions; and cancer service guidance to advise on how services should be organised to ensure good outcomes for patients.
	In February 2006, as part of its programme of work on interventional procedures, NICE issued guidance on the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of non melanoma skin tumours. It noted that the procedure was generally safe and did not cause major problems although, in theory, it could start off cancerous changes in the skin. It recommended that when doctors use this procedure for people with basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease or actinic keratosis, they should be sure that the patient understands what is involved and consents to the treatment and that the results of the procedure are monitored. NICE also noted that there is not much information available on how well the procedure works in people with squamous call carcinoma. There is a relatively high chance that the carcinoma will return after treatment, and there is a risk that the carcinoma will spread and become more dangerous. NICE has said that patients need to understand these risks before they agree to have PDT. They also need to understand that further treatment may be necessary.
	Also in February 2006, NICE published guidance on "Improving Outcomes for people with skin tumours, including melanoma". This guidance includes recommendations on the management of patients with suspected precancerous or cancerous skin lesions. It describes PDT including the advantages and disadvantages of this type of treatment and notes that, at present, there is little information available on long-term cure rates. It does however recommend that a number of surgical and non-surgical procedures for the treatment of skin cancer, including PDT, should be available for use by clinicians in relevant teams, subject to locally agreed standards of competence.
	There are no plans to ask NICE to produce additional guidance on this treatment.
	The main agency through which the Government supports medical and clinical research is the Medical Research Council (MRC). The MRC is an independent body funded by the Department of Trade and Industry via the Office of Science and Innovation. The Department is not directly funding research on PDT for cancer, but is providing NHS support through the national cancer research network for two trials of PDT for biliary tract cancers. Over 75 per cent. of the Department's total expenditure on health research is devolved to, and managed by, NHS organisations. Details of individual projects, including a number concerned with PDT, can be found on the department's website on the national research register at www.dh.gov.uk/research.

Preventive Technology Grant

David Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the level of the preventive technology grant will be; and how it will be distributed.

Ivan Lewis: The Government are investing a total of £80 million over two years from April 2006 through the preventative technology grant. The grant determination and allocations to local authorities were notified in Local Authority Circular LAC(2006)5 issued on 23 March, a copy of which is on the Department's website at www.dh.gov.uk.

Primary Care Trusts

Francis Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS dentists were practising within Horsham and Chactonbury Primary Care Trust area in each year for which records are available.

Rosie Winterton: Numbers of national health services dentists at local geographic areas are not readily available prior to 1997. However, the numbers of NHS dentists as at 31 December 1997 to 2005 is shown in the table.
	
		
			 General dental services (CDS) and personal dental services (PDS): Number of NHS dentists in Horsham and Chactonbury Primary Care Trust (PCT) as at 31 December each year 
			  Number 
			 1997 55 
			 1998 55 
			 1999 60 
			 2000 64 
			 2001 71 
			 2002 74 
			 2003 73 
			 2004 74 
			 2005 71 
			 Notes:1. Data includes all notifications of dentists joining or leaving the GDS or PDS, received by the NHS Business Services Authority, up to 23 March 2006. Figures for the numbers of dentists at specified dates may vary depending upon the notification period, for example, data with a later notification period will include more recent notifications of dentists joining or leaving the GDS or PDS.2. Dentists consist of principals, assistants and trainees. Prison contracts have been excluded from the data.3. The postcode of the dental practice was used to allocate dentists to specific geographic areas. PCT areas have been defined using the office for national statistics all fields postcode directory.4. A dentist with a GDS or PDS contract may provide as little or as much NHS treatment as he or she chooses or has agreed with the PCT. Information concerning the amount of time dedicated to NHS work by individual dentists are not centrally available.5. Data on dentists that work only in private practice are not held centrally.Sources:NHS Business Services AuthorityThe Information Centre for health and social care

Psoriasis

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many courses of treatment for psoriasis there were in each (a) government office region and (b) strategic health authority area in the last three years for which figures are available; what the cost per head of treatment was in each year; how many such courses of treatment used (i) corticosteroids, (ii) artificial phototherapy and (iii) heliotherapy in each case; and what the cost was of treatment of psoriasis by each method in each case.

Ivan Lewis: In 2004-05, there were 8,283 finished consultant episodes, in total 49,015 bed days, recorded for all psoriatic conditions.
	Prescription data cannot provide the number, or cost, of treatments for psoriasis with corticosteroids as these drugs are prescribed for other conditions.
	Notes:
	Finished consultant episode (FCE)
	A FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

Self-harm

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance she has issued to hospitals on dealing with patients who self-harm on site.

Rosie Winterton: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published self-harm Clinical Guidelines for NHS mental health provider trusts in 2004. The NICE guidelines cover the care which patients who harm themselves can expect to receive from healthcare professionals in and outside of hospital settings and what they can expect from their treatment.
	However, NICE guidelines do not attempt to explain self-harm or describe the treatment for this in detail. This is why the Department and the National Institute for Mental Health in England are re-evaluating current treatment approaches for self-harm, by undertaking an exploratory exercise on the appropriate management of self-harm. This will focus on adult service users, predominantly female, who self-harm as a coping mechanism or survival strategy. The exercise started in January 2006 and will run until autumn. It will ascertain the level of support at both local and regional levels and the evidence base for adopting a harm-reduction approach. It will also judge the appropriateness (with NICE) of developing guidelines and training to facilitate a harm-minimisation approach amongst service providers.

Voluntary Organisations (Compact Agreements)

Hywel Francis: To ask the Secretary of State for Health with which voluntary organisations the Department has a formal national Compact agreement.

Ivan Lewis: The Department has no formal national Compact agreements with any individual third sector (voluntary) organisations. The Department does have a strategic agreement with the national health service and third sector: "Making Partnership Work for Patients, Carers and Service Users" published in September 2004, which is underpinned by and complements the Compact and its codes of good practice.